1 posted on
07/30/2007 2:22:59 PM PDT by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: blam
Sorry, I don’t see anything. So, bang, there goes another theory.
2 posted on
07/30/2007 2:27:19 PM PDT by
sr4402
To: blam
Yea, and if you look at it right to left, instead of left to right, it says “Paul is dead.”
3 posted on
07/30/2007 2:27:32 PM PDT by
mikeus_maximus
(CAIR delende est.)
To: blam
My theory says that Dan Brown may not find all his gained riches worth it.
To: blam
5 posted on
07/30/2007 2:28:41 PM PDT by
razorback-bert
(Posted by Time's Man of the Year)
To: Girlene
Ping for obvious reasons.
7 posted on
07/30/2007 2:29:13 PM PDT by
RedRover
(DefendOurMarines.com)
To: blam
—Slavisa Pesci, an Italian amateur scholar—
“Pesci” means “Fishes” in Italian.
Jesus’s symbol is a fish.
Therefore, it may be stated conclusively that Ms. Pesci is a descendant of Christ and Mary Magdalene </s>.
8 posted on
07/30/2007 2:29:16 PM PDT by
rfp1234
(Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
To: blam
9 posted on
07/30/2007 2:31:47 PM PDT by
Jaysun
(Certified thread hijacker since 7-7-07 (by restornu and blu))
To: blam
There’s a sucker born every minute. Assuming this is true, and that it really is an image of a woman holding a young child, what does that tell us of the historical Jesus? Leonardo lived 1400+ years after the events depicted in that painting. How could he possibly have any idea what went on during the Last Supper? And what the heck are “knights” doing there? There were no “knights” during that time period. Unless those “knights” are supposed to be Roman centurions, but that just makes the painting make LESS sense.
To: blam
It looks like the waitress is bringing the bill...
To: blam
Actually, that’s Boy George holding a crack pipe.
12 posted on
07/30/2007 2:34:14 PM PDT by
struggle
((The struggle continues))
To: blam
13 posted on
07/30/2007 2:35:00 PM PDT by
rfp1234
(Nothing is better than eternal happiness. A ham sandwich is better than nothing. Therefore...)
To: blam
So, when an image of a feminine looking character who is looking AWAY from Jesus is reversed, it looks like there is a feminine looking character looking AT Jesus. Oh my goodness, that’s amazing!
*yawn*
15 posted on
07/30/2007 2:36:00 PM PDT by
dangus
To: blam
One thing that Da Vinci did was to sketch his idea out, re-sketch them and continue this until he found what he was looking for. I think this is what people are seeing. He did the same thing with the chapel cieling. He sketched and sketched and sketched. You would, most likely, see the same types of things.
16 posted on
07/30/2007 2:36:03 PM PDT by
RC2
To: blam
18 posted on
07/30/2007 2:37:26 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
To: blam
This “scholar,” Slavisa Pesci, has stared at bathroom tiles too long. The next thing he will see is the Virgin Mary in a toasted cheese sandwich. However, like the mirror-imaged Last Supper, images in toasted cheese sandwiches are nothing new.
To: blam
Just some garbage that will find its way into another anti-Christian novel just before Easter.
To: blam
And superimposed Jesus has 3 eyes and 2 noses which means...?
24 posted on
07/30/2007 2:40:59 PM PDT by
Kirkwood
To: blam
And many of the disciples are suddenly seen to be dining upon severed heads and fingers.
Yes, we see it all ~ the cannibalism represented in the Communion ~ more conspiracies, more conspiracies!!!!!
25 posted on
07/30/2007 2:41:11 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: blam
29 posted on
07/30/2007 2:43:39 PM PDT by
Jeff Chandler
(A man who will not defend himself does not deserve to be defended by others.)
To: blam
Da Vinci Code II -- Opens this fall!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
