To: blam
Sorry, I don’t see anything. So, bang, there goes another theory.
2 posted on
07/30/2007 2:27:19 PM PDT by
sr4402
To: sr4402
And even if everyone did, it’s still worthless. Leo wasn’t present for the Last Supper. And photography didn’t exist. There’s no documentation in the painting. It’s like t*ts on a boar hog. Pointless. I can’t believe this keeps coming up. It offers the same “proof” as a grilled cheese sandwich on ebay.
22 posted on
07/30/2007 2:38:54 PM PDT by
Sue Perkick
(And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
To: sr4402
Nether do I see anything. It would have saved a lot of time if the scholar simply took a Marks-A-Lot nib pen and drew in anything his little mind could conceive. What special knowledge do these dimwits thank an artist of the 1500’s had to a supper that took place in about 30 AD?
49 posted on
07/30/2007 3:15:43 PM PDT by
CHEE
To: sr4402
"Sorry, I don’t see anything." Nor do I. This reminds me of the religious image on the hood of a junked car. Give me a break!!
55 posted on
07/30/2007 3:48:17 PM PDT by
davisfh
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson