Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The YouTube Debate: Send In The Clowns
Townhall.com ^ | July 29, 2007 | Ken Connor

Posted on 07/29/2007 3:56:43 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 07/29/2007 3:56:44 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The YouTube Debate: Send In The Clowns

In the Rats case:

But where are the clowns? Quick, send in the clowns.

Don't bother, they're here."
2 posted on 07/29/2007 3:59:21 AM PDT by Kozak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If you haven’t seen it already, get the movie “Idiocracy” which is about this happening in the future...


3 posted on 07/29/2007 4:00:59 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well after suffering through 8 years of the morning press conference during the Clinton years....nothing surprises me.


4 posted on 07/29/2007 4:10:18 AM PDT by leenie312
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The reporters then said the debate was more like American Idol than Meet the Press. The implication was that this is a good thing.

Why not have naked, wrestling lesbians give the questions?

5 posted on 07/29/2007 4:10:43 AM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
"Free-wheeling video questions from ordinary citizens put a fresh spark into the staid ritual of presidential debates this week, with everything from a talking snowman to a guy cradling a rifle he called 'my baby'."

Ahem....

So, Lurker, I'm just curious...

6 posted on 07/29/2007 4:12:04 AM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Because real lesbians don’t look like the actresses in porno movies.


7 posted on 07/29/2007 4:12:49 AM PDT by conserveababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Someone told me that movie was kind of pro-left-wing. Was she wrong?


8 posted on 07/29/2007 4:14:15 AM PDT by conserveababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; All
Well, whatever value debates may have had it the past, all I see nowadays is Kabuki Theatre, staged so the chattering classes have something to yap about.

They serve no useful purpose anymore, and have not for some time. We'd do better without this nonsense.

9 posted on 07/29/2007 4:21:43 AM PDT by backhoe (-30-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My .357 is my baby. It fits into the drawer by my bed.


10 posted on 07/29/2007 4:22:17 AM PDT by conserveababe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conserveababe
Because real lesbians don’t look like the actresses in porno movies.

Don't matter... it beats a snowman.

11 posted on 07/29/2007 4:24:28 AM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The "YouTube Debate" was as useful as learning about Billy Clintoooooooon's underwear or that he kept Astroturf in the back of his pick up truck!

The seriousness and responsibility of selecting the President of the United States has diminished into being a prop for the pimps of the Election Industry, principally the Main Stream Media!
12 posted on 07/29/2007 4:24:35 AM PDT by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conserveababe

Somewhat (what Hollywood film doesn’t?) but it still shows the path we are heading for, and the dumbing-down of society.


13 posted on 07/29/2007 4:26:27 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Cuius testiculos habeas, habeas cardia et cerebellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: conserveababe

She’s right to a degree. It’s to be expected given the intended audience (college kids, who, like, are so, like smart and stuff) and that the writing was only slightly less stupid than the characters themselves. If you do watch it, do so with a college kid (who’s, like, so, like smart and stuff) in the room .... and watch them watch it. It’s an experience.


14 posted on 07/29/2007 4:29:33 AM PDT by Lil'freeper (You do not have the plug-in required to view this tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

The image of Tammy Bruce jumped into my minds eye.

What an image that would be....oh ya


15 posted on 07/29/2007 4:31:11 AM PDT by ThreePuttinDude ()...temporarily out of service ....()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: johnny7
Why not have naked, wrestling lesbians give the questions?

There is nothing that would prevent the modern liberal from welcoming such a degradation.

As they drag us toward Sodom in the culture war, the spectre of such an event will actually become plausible.

16 posted on 07/29/2007 4:33:40 AM PDT by Old Landmarks (No fear of man, none!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Countless commentators have fawned over how refreshing it was to replace those stuffy old reporters with videos of real people with real concerns.

The only way to get some semblence of "fairness" in these debates is to allow a group of "Republican" supporters to pose questions - and also a "Democratic" group of reporters.

With this recent juvenile "debate" posed by CNN, the ratio of liberal-based questions to conservative-based questions was 15-1 (Talk show host Hugh Hewitt did a devastating analysis last week in which he demonstrated the premise of each so-called "unbiased" questioner which was CHOSEN -- emphasis on CHOSEN -- by CNN staffers.)

Heck, all those CHOSEN questions were simply a proxy for Republican hating CNN.

17 posted on 07/29/2007 4:41:39 AM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The first paragraph of this article is very striking. And true. Unfortunately, the dumbing down of America continues at an exponential rate.

Much of You Tube is helping.

“Reality” (boy, there’s a misnomer) TV is helping.

Insipid, vapid TV shows like “Age of Love,” “Big Brother,” "American Idol," etc. are helping.

A real shame.

18 posted on 07/29/2007 4:49:37 AM PDT by upchuck (The Hildabeaste fears Fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThreePuttinDude
The image of Tammy Bruce jumped into my minds eye.

Quite acceptable... and intelligent as well. I'd even let her answer her own question.

19 posted on 07/29/2007 4:54:33 AM PDT by johnny7 ("But that one on the far left... he had crazy eyes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The extreme leftist domination of Youtube (many leftists spend all their time planting leftist propaganda on Youtube) works seamlessly to further reinforce the nihlism that has poisoned our culture since the sixties.

Youtube is an exceptionally profane and vulgar site reflecting the godless anti-American drug culture of the left which is defined by sex-obsession, narcissism and the inability to identify and reject what is shameful.

20 posted on 07/29/2007 4:56:29 AM PDT by Old Landmarks (No fear of man, none!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson