Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

X-48B Blended Wing Body Research Aircraft Makes First Flight
26 july 2007 | Gray Creech

Posted on 07/27/2007 8:17:19 PM PDT by radar101

X-48B Blended Wing Body Research Aircraft Makes First Flight

The collaborative efforts of the Boeing Co. of Chicago, Ill., NASA's Fundamental Aeronautics Program, and the Air Force Research Laboratory at Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio culminated on the first flight of the X-48B Blended Wing Body research aircraft on July 20, 2007. The experienced flight research team kept a watchful eye as the 21-foot wingspan, 500-pound, remotely piloted test vehicle took off for the first time at 8:42 a.m. PDT and climbed to an altitude of 7,500 feet before landing 31 minutes later.

"Friday's flight marked yet another aviation first achieved by a very hard-working Boeing, NASA, AFRL, and Cranfield team," said Gary Cosentino, Dryden's Blended Wing Body project manager for NASA's Subsonic Fixed Wing Project. "The X-48B flew as well as we had predicted, and we look forward to many productive data flights this summer and fall."

In addition to hosting the X-48B flight test and research activities, NASA provided engineering and technical support -- expertise garnered from years of operating cutting-edge air vehicles. NASA assisted with the hardware and software validation and verification process, the integration and testing of the aircraft systems, and the pilot's ground control station. NASA's range group provided critical telemetry and command and control communications during the flight, while the flight operations group provided a T-34 chase aircraft and essential flight scheduling. Photo and video support completed the effort.

The Subsonic Fixed Wing Project team under the Fundamental Aeronautics Program has long supported the development of the blended wing body concept. It has participated in numerous collaborations with Boeing, as well as several wind tunnel tests for different speed regimes. The team is focused on researching the low-speed characteristics of the design and expanding its flight envelope beyond the limits of current capabilities.

NASA is interested in the potential benefits of the aircraft - increased volume for carrying capacity, efficient aerodynamics for reduced fuel burn, and, possibly, significant reductions in noise due to propulsion integration options. In these initial flights, the principal focus is to validate prior research on the aerodynamic performance and controllability of the shape, including comparisons of the flight data with the extensive wind-tunnel database.

The X-48B flight test vehicles were designed to gather detailed information about the stability and flight-control characteristics of the blended wing body design, especially during takeoffs and landings. The blended wing body design resembles a flying wing, but differs in that the wing blends smoothly into a wide, flat, tailless fuselage. This fuselage blending provides additional lift with less drag than a traditional circular fuselage, translating into reduced fuel use at cruise conditions. Since the engines can be mounted on the top surface of the configuration there is a potential for significant noise reduction on the ground.

Three turbojet engines enable the composite-skinned, 8.5 percent scale vehicle to fly up to 10,000 feet and 120 knots in its low-speed configuration. The aircraft is flown remotely from a ground control station in which the pilot uses conventional aircraft controls and instrumentation while looking at a monitor fed by a forward-looking camera on the aircraft.

Up to 25 flights are planned to gather data in these low-speed flight regimes. Then, the X-48B may be used to test the aircraft's low-noise and handling characteristics at transonic speeds.

Two X-48B research vehicles were built by Cranfield Aerospace Ltd., in Bedford, England, in accordance with Boeing requirements. The vehicle that flew on July 20 is Ship 2, which also was used for ground and taxi testing. Ship 1, a duplicate, completed extensive wind tunnel testing in 2006 at the Full-Scale Tunnel at NASA's Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va. Ship 1 will be available for use as a backup during the flight test program.

For more information about NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and its research projects, visit: http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden on the Internet.

.

' '


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aviation; flyingwing; nasa; uav; xplane
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 07/27/2007 8:17:21 PM PDT by radar101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: radar101

2 posted on 07/27/2007 8:22:54 PM PDT by radar101 (Duncan Hunter-The only possibility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

3 posted on 07/27/2007 8:23:47 PM PDT by Crazieman (The Democratic Party: Culture of Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Paging Batman: your new plane is ready.

4 posted on 07/27/2007 8:24:05 PM PDT by Lucretia Borgia (Who ever said the pen is mightier than the sword never met automatic weapons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Puking first class or coach? Not a good design for passengers. Especially if there are yaw problems in turbulence or weather.


5 posted on 07/27/2007 8:24:33 PM PDT by GBA (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

6 posted on 07/27/2007 8:26:06 PM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: radar101

And folks that ride camels think they can beat us. Only in the forum of public opinion, not in the tech area.


7 posted on 07/27/2007 8:27:34 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

Thats not it, its the “797” mockup someone came up with a while ago. Boeing denies that exists.


8 posted on 07/27/2007 8:28:17 PM PDT by Crazieman (The Democratic Party: Culture of Treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: radar101

Mini-Boeing Bump...


9 posted on 07/27/2007 8:28:39 PM PDT by Bender2 (A 'Good Yankee' comes down to Texas, then goes back north. A 'Damn Yankee' stays... Damn it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GBA

It’s my understanding that computer controlled fly by wire has taken care of most of these problems ala B-2.


10 posted on 07/27/2007 8:29:08 PM PDT by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

What kind of plane is that. Airbus?


11 posted on 07/27/2007 8:30:26 PM PDT by Pit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

I saw it on the internet, it must be true.


12 posted on 07/27/2007 8:31:50 PM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GBA
B-B-B-But-but-but the APCAM FD ("Automatic Puke Cancel Mode Flight Director") is going to be 'prefectered' on the 787.

No worries.

13 posted on 07/27/2007 8:32:50 PM PDT by skeptoid (AA, UE, MBS (with clusters))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pit1

It’s a fake that was being passed on an Anti-airbus thread a few months ago.


14 posted on 07/27/2007 8:33:30 PM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ontap

Won’t fix the lack of windows problem...read up on early B-1 issues. Window are very important. Speaking of B-1s, I once had a flight to Rapid City on a Beech 1900 that lost cabin pressure(?) and a/c. Anyway, we had to cruise at a very turbulent altitude, lots of yaw...and almost everyone was puking. So bad, it almost got to me. I’ve never puked on an airplane...at least not yet...neggies are rough.


15 posted on 07/27/2007 8:37:14 PM PDT by GBA (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: skeptoid

Glad to hear it. That’s all I need to know.


16 posted on 07/27/2007 8:38:15 PM PDT by GBA (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pit1
What kind of plane is that
17 posted on 07/27/2007 8:39:29 PM PDT by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GBA
Why would this design be any worse for passengers than usual?

You suggest it would have yaw problems -- why would it?

If it was controlled by classic aileron and rudder control surfaces, then I can imagine it would be harder to keep from yaw'ing than a traditional separate fuselage and wing design, because it lacks that nice long skinny fuselage that tends to want to fly where it's pointed.

But I'm assuming this plane has some fancy computers managing its control surfaces, and can fly whatever why they want it to fly, preferably nice and stable for land lubbers like me, even in turbulence.

18 posted on 07/27/2007 8:41:42 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow (The Greens steal in fear of pollution, The Reds in fear of greed; Fear arising from a lack of Faith.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: radar101

IT looks scary. I don’t see much stability in the shape. The thrust is nowhere near the center of gravity. What controls angle of attack? There’s no cannards, there’s no rudder, there’s no tail section. The wings have no dihedral that I can see. Is this thing supposed to be flown by a human, or a super computer? It looks like it would flip nose over tail like a 3x5 note card tossed out a car window.


19 posted on 07/27/2007 8:42:56 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

very cool


20 posted on 07/27/2007 8:42:59 PM PDT by finnman69 (May Paris Hilton's plane crash into Britney Spears house while Lindsey Lohan is over doing coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson