Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rudy Giullani : Leading America Toward Energy Independence
RealClearPolitics ^ | 07/26/2007 | Rudy Giullani

Posted on 07/26/2007 10:49:46 AM PDT by SirLinksalot

America needs to become energy independent.

We should have started to move toward energy independence back in the 1970s, when oil prices spiked and there were the long lines at gas stations. Presidents Nixon and Carter talked about energy independence, but not a lot got done. The next President of the United States is going to have to make it a major goal of their administration. Most people will say it's impossible, we've tried before. I'm running for president because I know how to get things done.

I will move America toward energy independence. It will require setting goals, sticking to them and energizing the American people to achieve them. It will require expanding our reliance on a much more diverse range of energy sources that America can control.

Ethanol and other bio-fuels are already helping America move toward energy independence. But it is embarrassing that Brazil is so far ahead of America in the use of ethanol. It should be the other way around. Seventy percent of the new cars sold in Brazil can use ethanol. In the United States there's only a very small percentage. In Brazil you can pull up to most gas stations and get ethanol. That's not the case in the United States. Our goal has to be more growth in ethanol. Because every percentage that we increase our use of ethanol, we reduce our reliance on foreign oil from volatile areas of the world.

Just like Brazil is ahead of us in ethanol, France is ahead of us in nuclear power. Eighty percent of the electricity in France comes from nuclear power. Only twenty percent of electricity in America is generated by nuclear power and it's going to go down to fifteen percent in the future if we don't do something about it.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; elections; energy; energyindependence; giuliani; giullani; independence; rudy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

1 posted on 07/26/2007 10:49:51 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Ethanol and other bio-fuels are already helping America move toward energy independence.

That's an interesting statement that I don't believe. We need as much energy independence as we can get. Utilizing our food supply to acquire that is absurd IMO.
2 posted on 07/26/2007 10:53:32 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

‘America needs to become energy independent. ‘

Really?

Will Rudy please tell me what country on this planet is ‘energy independent’?

I’ll wait.....


3 posted on 07/26/2007 10:55:39 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
http://www.opinionjournal.com/weekend/hottopic/?id=110008530

June 17, 2006

The most widely cited research on this subject comes from Cornell's David Pimental and Berkeley's Ted Patzek. They've found that it takes more than a gallon of fossil fuel to make one gallon of ethanol -- 29% more. That's because it takes enormous amounts of fossil-fuel energy to grow corn (using fertilizer and irrigation), to transport the crops and then to turn that corn into ethanol.

4 posted on 07/26/2007 10:56:45 AM PDT by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Giullani is right on energy independence. If only he was right on guns, abortion, marriage and the border.
5 posted on 07/26/2007 10:57:31 AM PDT by 2001convSVT ("People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

“Will Rudy please tell me what country on this planet is ‘energy independent’?

I’ll wait.....”

Canada? Saudi Arabia? Norway? Brazil maybe close?


6 posted on 07/26/2007 10:58:20 AM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

My research indicates Rudy himself contains enough hot air to power 1/2 the U.S.


7 posted on 07/26/2007 10:59:38 AM PDT by gdani (The average speed of a house fly is 4.5 miles an hour)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Cornell's David Pimental

I'll take his word on *any* research right after I start accepting Al Gore's claims on Global Warming.
8 posted on 07/26/2007 10:59:54 AM PDT by P-40 (Al Qaeda was working in Iraq. They were just undocumented.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Canada? Saudi Arabia? Norway? Brazil maybe close?

In order;

Nope, nope, nope, and nope.


9 posted on 07/26/2007 11:00:00 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

A real selling point for this issue would be to starve the islamonazis of their oil revenue. That if nothing else should be our goal!


10 posted on 07/26/2007 11:00:06 AM PDT by NCBraveheart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
ANWAR needs to come up in the debates for all of the candidates. I bet all of the top tier would say no to that.
11 posted on 07/26/2007 11:01:13 AM PDT by Sybeck1 (I like Rodney Carrington's recipe for World Peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2001convSVT

‘Giullani is right on energy independence. If only he was right on guns, abortion, marriage and the border.’

Not really. Its an unrealistic, and completely unattainable goal, one that no country in this planet’s history has acheived in the modern era.

Its a pipedream, in short.


12 posted on 07/26/2007 11:01:25 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot

Ya know, if he’d mentioned Nuclear Power, I’d inched a little towards votin’ for the clown.

But he didn’t.

Rudy Guliani. He doesn’t have an effin’ clue.


13 posted on 07/26/2007 11:01:34 AM PDT by Little Ray (Rudy Guiliani: If his wives can't trust him, why should we?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SirLinksalot
Just more evidence that Rudy doesn’t have what it takes to be President. He would do better than a communist with fat thighs, but that Hobbson’s choice isn’t inevitable.
14 posted on 07/26/2007 11:01:48 AM PDT by vetsvette (Bring Him Back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shermy

Canada has an energy surplus, many people in the USA are enjoying that fact... just look at the 500KV lines that run across the border... BC Hydro, Quebec Hydro, Hydro One Ontario... all net exporters, Canada also exports Uranium, #1 exporter in the world, and Oil to the US....


15 posted on 07/26/2007 11:01:56 AM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

I think Ethanol is a short term fix. Fuel cell technology will eventually (50 years) become huge.


16 posted on 07/26/2007 11:08:07 AM PDT by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray; Sybeck1

On a side note, when I managed to get to a meeting with Duncan Hunter when he visited Alabama, I managed to ask him about energy and what he’d do about making us more independent of from foreign oil.

That’s where I learned he’s a supporter of nuclear power, drilling in ANWR, and offshore drilling.


17 posted on 07/26/2007 11:09:52 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (Look at all the candidates. Choose who you think is best. Choose wisely in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
Ya know, if he’d mentioned Nuclear Power, I’d inched a little towards votin’ for the clown. But he didn’t.

He did mention Nuclear Power... read the WHOLE article ( that was just an excerpt I posted ). Here's the next paragraph :

"Just like Brazil is ahead of us in ethanol, France is ahead of us in nuclear power. Eighty percent of the electricity in France comes from nuclear power. Only twenty percent of electricity in America is generated by nuclear power and it's going to go down to fifteen percent in the future if we don't do something about it. We invented the peaceful use of nuclear power, but we've let other countries get ahead of us. There is no reason for that. No one's ever died from nuclear power in the United States. Despite that fact, we haven't licensed a new nuclear power plant in the United States in 30 years. "
18 posted on 07/26/2007 11:09:57 AM PDT by SirLinksalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: NCBraveheart

I agree, for all of the talk of one world markets, we are in effect arming our mortal enemies in China and the Middle East to a point, not all of our oil comes from the land of allah....


19 posted on 07/26/2007 11:10:08 AM PDT by padre35 (Conservative in Exile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Actually, if you read the whole article, he does cover nuclear energy.


20 posted on 07/26/2007 11:10:14 AM PDT by free me (Enforce the borders, then we'll talk...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson