as "a dear friend of mine" and called the framer a "fair guy" and "even-handed".
Posted on 07/25/2007 1:08:11 PM PDT by AuntB
Sheesh.
They also interviewed two of the jurors who said if they'd heard ALL the facts, they would have never convicted.
“It appears as though the U.S. Attorney’s Office was so intent on getting Ramos and Compean that their judgment was totally clouded to the degree they aided and abetted a criminal...”
______________________
What a fool.
Good for Rohrbacher, but the same Congress that is getting its shorts in a knot over Miers et al refusing to testify didn't have a hissy about this?!
“Rohrabacher obtained copies of Aldrete-Davila’s border pass cards in a Freedom of Information Act request filed with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.”
This entire border issue has become a total farce.
ping
And the RNC, Bush and the Republican Congress members wonder why the base no longer donates money and/or time. We have seen one travesty after another from this administration, I am so sorry to say. Guess the old adage holds true, “never fall in love with a politician, they will break your heart every time.”
After hearing this major story this morning on L.I. Show, I expected this to be all over the news today, but this is the first I’ve seen of it.
Guess the fact that the higher-ups in federal government are allowing/encouraging drug runners to freely cross the border isn’t important. According to Dana Rohrbacher’s aide who was interviewed first, the free pass wasn’t signed off by a typical authorizer, but it was someone farther up the ladder.
There was much more discussed, and the whole interview was maddening. How does any of this make sense?
And as Hunter pointed out there was NO REASON WHATSOEVER for Sutton to charge them with the ‘assault with a firearm DURING a crime’ statute. THIS is the reason that they got the minimum 10 years. But THIS charge is false, even if everything else is true. This statute is for underlying crimes, such as a bankrobbery when you use the weapon. Compean and Ramos had NO underlying crime, unless Sutton thinks apprehending an illegal alien drug pusher is an underlying crime. And the Jury was not told what that charge entailed.
Sutton is a slimeball.
I wonder if Vincente Fox stlll goes to their bar-b-ques as well (now that he's out of office)?
Either Sutton or someone up the food chain decided to make this an “example” for all to see.
There is some kind of conspiracy going on here with the perp and the Mexican Gov't having a pipeline into Sutton's office (and/or higher).
This is the first I've heard of it, too.
But...but...they committed a crime! /sarc
Bush equals cronyism. Bush now has admitted, when pushed on the pardon issue, that the US attorney who pursued this case is a friend of his. Bush’s rationalization was that the two agents were found guilty by a jury of their peers. Seems to me that Scooter Libby was found guilty by a jury of his peers. Oh, I forgot, Libby is a friend of George as well.
George Bush - dumb and corrupt. Oh, I forgot arrogant. Don’t you just love that swagger and that smirk? Let’s see, less than 18 months to go.
Thanks B! Ingraham is on tape delay here. I will try to listen
Johnny Sutton turns out to be worse than we ever thought
Sutton: "We have no evidence -- if someone has some evidence that this van driver,
that this illegal alien committed a crime, I would be happy to have it,
because I would be happy to put this guy in prison for as long as we possibly can."
Lou Dobbs Tonight -- CNN -- February 16, 2007
And as Hunter pointed out there was NO REASON WHATSOEVER for Sutton to charge them with the ‘assault with a firearm DURING a crime’ statute. THIS is the reason that they got the minimum 10 years. But THIS charge is false, even if everything else is true. This statute is for underlying crimes, such as a bankrobbery when you use the weapon. Compean and Ramos had NO underlying crime, unless Sutton thinks apprehending an illegal alien drug pusher is an underlying crime. And the Jury was not told what that charge entailed.
______________________
No LEO has ever been charged under this statute designed for piling on charges on criminals. Slimy Sutton was first. I’m praying I live to see Johnny Sutton brought to justice
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.