Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hunter: 'Postage stamp' Israel should not give up 'one inch' of territory
World Tribune ^ | 7/24/07 | staff

Posted on 07/24/2007 5:01:38 PM PDT by pissant

WASHINGTON — A contender for the Republican presidential nomination has ruled out an Israeli withdrawal as part of any peace accord with the Arabs. Rep. Duncan Hunter, one of 10 Republicans vying for their party's 2008 presidential nomination, said Israel must not withdraw from "one inch" of territory as part of an Arab peace accord. Hunter, the former chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, termed Israel a "postage stamp of a country" that could not afford to cede territory.

On May 20, Hunter, a California Republican, voiced his position during a meeting with Christian Zionists in Alexandria, Va. He recalled his visit to the Golan Heights, the scene of intense armored battles with Syria during the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Middle East Newsline reported.

During his trip, Hunter and his father were taken to a narrow valley in which a handful of Israeli main battle tanks blocked more than 1,400 Soviet-built Syrian MBTs during the 1973 Yom Kippur War. The House member recalled that at that point he vowed to support Israel's territorial claims.

(Excerpt) Read more at worldtribune.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: duncanhunter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last
To: SoCalPol
You know these Paulites wouldn’t be out supporting our country as they are against fighting the terrorists. They don’t even believe the terrorists were involved in 9/11

See, that's why I can't recognize them. They hide when it's time to protect/defend our country!

101 posted on 07/24/2007 7:43:50 PM PDT by CAluvdubya (DUNCAN HUNTER '08 (I'll add Thompson if he ever decides to enter the race))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

The Paulites are the jehovah witnesses of politics.

They twist the Constitution and won’t fight the enemy


102 posted on 07/24/2007 7:50:14 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Duncan Hunter '08 Tough on WOT & Illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Oh well then we cancel each other out. No problem. i Lump Rudy, Fred, Mitt, and John in with the DEMs. Fred today appointed an open borders shill to head his campaign. The only way Ron Paul could even remotely be labeled a DEM is an old Southern Democrat which were far more conservative than many Republicans of their time actually. Just because he didn’t give Bush all he asked for on Iraq he is a DEM? Ron Paul understands what war is. Our POTUS does not. Bush talks about it but any POTUS who understood what war requires of nation and the ones fighting it would never declare such without the nations backing meaning a declaration of war. Ron Paul asked for that declaration before entering Iraq.

The fact that even after 5 years we are still fighting in Iraq speaks volumes that Bush is clueless as to what it would have taken to win. His own make them up as he goes rules prevent a victory in Iraq. Most Americans thought it was ober when he landed on the deck of the LINCOLN. He even denied our troops and our nation giving Saddam a Military Tribunal. It is not the duty of GW Bush or Taxpayers to re-build the nation of Iraq he does not have that power what part of that can you not understand? If you don't think the Clerics aren't preparing to place a new Saddam in power ypu'll find out soon enough. In the mean time Billions are being tossed down the hole to contractors that our military could have used back home to re-build a military Poppy, Clinton, and Congress, have almost destroyed. Bush has done ZILCH to rebuild our military except get photo ops. Look at the Troop End Strength Numbers they don't lie. Almost the same level as 1996.

Remember this also the very reason we have few nukes is due to Bush’s Dad and Cheney. Since when is upholding and defending the Constitution warper? I doubt Bush can even spell it maybe that is why he called it that ****ed piece of paper huh?

103 posted on 07/24/2007 9:26:04 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Proud Partisan Constitution Supporting Conservative to which I make no apologies for nor back down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

?Yes, but the words “Congress shall make no law” kept running through my head.<

Oh, my gosh, you are right! Ok scratch the background checks.


104 posted on 07/24/2007 10:43:06 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

I don’t know what your problem is, but I worked very hard for Ronald Reagsn’s campaigns, and if you are really a Reagan Man, why are you not trying to get Duncan Hunter, the man most like Reagan, nominated, instead of needling his volunteers?


105 posted on 07/24/2007 10:47:42 PM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll
>>>>>I don’t know what your problem is ...

If you had followed the thread, you'd know. In a nutshell, its not constructive for Hunter's supporters to attack FredT in the hopes of helping out a faltering Hunter campaign. And you getting all emotional, calling that fact, "vulgar, crass and disrespectful" is just plain dumb.

I like Hunter's conservative record. As a Presidential candidate, however, he's been unimpressive. If Hunter is the nominee I'll support him. At this point that is a far fetched notion.

This time around the field of candidates is weak. When the time is right I'll choose who I believe is the best man to represent conservative Republicans. I'll tell you this. Should Fred Thompson decide to make it official, he'll be a strong addition to the candidate field. But FredT will also have to prove himself worthy of support from conservatives.

106 posted on 07/24/2007 11:08:54 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Hey pissant! Hunter rocks! Who can ping me? Thanks!


107 posted on 07/24/2007 11:50:19 PM PDT by Califreak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehrling
Not as badly as people make out.. anyone in congress for that long is going to have a spending record that can be questioned..

Rightfully questioned. And I only looked back 6 or so years, not 20. He also voted for the Prescription Bill and No Child Left Behind. Those were widely opposed within Repubican ranks and here, of course. He needs to show, not just promise, that he can tighten the Big Gov budget.

108 posted on 07/25/2007 5:03:57 AM PDT by Puddleglum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

I think the only one who has mentioned FDT’s name on this thread has been none other than....ta da da DAH! REAGAN MAN!

No one has asked for your counterproductive opinion, yet you insist on posting it over and over and over again ad nauseum.


109 posted on 07/25/2007 10:21:53 AM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll
>>>>>>>>>I think the only one who has mentioned FDT’s name on this thread has been none other than....ta da da DAH! REAGAN MAN!

Doesn't matter who mentioned what, when or where. You responded to a post I made to another FReeper. Since this is an open political forum for conservatives to voice their opinions, you have every right to reply to my post and visa versa. So, I'll continue to post what I see as fit and proper. If you choose to whine about it, so be it. Won't change a thing.

>>>>>No one has asked for your counterproductive opinion, yet you insist on posting it over and over and over again ad nauseum.

Pointing out that Duncan Hunter's campaign is stalled and going nowhere is not counterproductive. Its stating a fact. Pointing out that attacking FredT doesn't improve Hunter's campaign is not counterproductive. Its stating the truth. Posting those remarks on a few threads over a few days, doesn't equate to "posting it over and over and over again ad nauseum", as you say.

And since this is America, and since this is Free Republic, I don't need your permission, or anyones permission to post anything. If you don't like my posts, replies and threads, don't read them. Simple as that.

I usually ignore you emotional rockheads. The fact I've ticked you off so, is gratifying. Thanks for playing.

110 posted on 07/25/2007 3:03:01 PM PDT by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson