Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/22/2007 8:13:07 PM PDT by bnelson44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: SandRat

ping


2 posted on 07/22/2007 8:14:06 PM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

If Mitt Romney thinks it’s fine for homosexuals to take little boys off into the woods, I would say his candidacy is toast.


3 posted on 07/22/2007 8:16:01 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Certainly wouldn’t want Mitt sitting on the Supreme Court, do we?

That would be disastrous.


4 posted on 07/22/2007 8:20:03 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain And Proud of It! Those who support the troops will pray for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

YouTube clip here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEOJNw4lmlI


6 posted on 07/22/2007 8:21:02 PM PDT by bnelson44 (http://www.appealforcourage.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
A Boy Scout leader can have such a big influence on kids that homosexuals just shouldn't be in those roles, perhaps even more so these days when many children are not guided by their parents as much as when I was a kid.

If the 'life-long hunter' believes that homosexuals should be shaping the lives of little boys, he will not get my vote.

9 posted on 07/22/2007 8:27:53 PM PDT by JustaDumbBlonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

If Romney gets the nomination, you would have to say that he pulled a Republican Clinton, and deserves to share one of Clinton’s many appellations, Slick Mitt.


11 posted on 07/22/2007 8:44:25 PM PDT by Biblebelter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
Now, does everyone understand why Fred has not "officially" gotten into the fray? The GOP candidates are determined to destroy each other so the Dems won't have to.
12 posted on 07/22/2007 8:46:21 PM PDT by no dems (Dear God, how long are you going to let Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd and John Conyers live?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

I like Mitt Romney less and less. The last thing we need is another self-acclaimed “moderate.” Duncan Hunter BUMP


13 posted on 07/22/2007 8:48:40 PM PDT by Libertina (FRee Republic - The most prestigious address on the WWW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

McCain crashed. Giuliani is slip-sliding away. And Romney’s going nowhere fast.

None of that’s going to help Brownback. But it sure is paving the way for Fred.


15 posted on 07/22/2007 8:49:22 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

If Romney “was hostile to Scout participation in the 2002 Olympics”, it was on instructions from the LDS Church leadership. The Boy Scouts program is inextricably intertwined with the LDS Church’s Young Men’s program (all boys from age 8-18), so Romney is certainly not anti-Boy Scouts.

It may be that Church leaders didn’t want formal Boy Scout participation in the SLC Olympics because they were being careful to avoid the appearance of trying to run the Olympics as a sort of missionary showcase for the LDS Church. Since most of the Boy Scout troops in Utah are sponsored by LDS Church wards, and are basically a required Church activity for boys, they may have felt it looked like blurring the line. The troop meetings are held at the Church ward buildings, and so preparing to participate in Olympics activities would have become a required Church activity carried out at Church facilities.


16 posted on 07/22/2007 8:56:45 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

Romney suffers from the misfortune of having run for office in Massachusetts. It was probably unavoidable that he’d take some liberal positions that would hurt him with conservative Republicans. But this is nothing new, as we have the same with Giuliani, and Clinton and Gore were pro-life and pro-second amendment when running for statewide office in Arkansas and Tennessee. Reagan was once a Democrat. As much as we might like perfect consistency, we seldom get it when candidates move from state to national aspirations.

But I feel sure what little chance Brownback might ever have had is now gone as people learned that he’s been, and still is, an open borders guy. His well noted switchback, or voting for cloture on the immigration before he voted against it (after realizing if wasn’t going to achieve cloture). One of the more cowardly public displays in recent memory, earning him the name of Senator Switchback.


17 posted on 07/22/2007 9:06:04 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

This anti Boy Scout,pro gay agenda by Romney is news to me.As Governor of Mass I didn’t here any of this stuff coming from Romney,however if this is how Romney truly feels he can shove his campaign as far as I’m concerned !!!


18 posted on 07/22/2007 9:06:11 PM PDT by Obie Wan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

A bump for Brownback!


19 posted on 07/22/2007 9:13:57 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
The more these "issues" come up every four years, the more people think the only people running for this office are boobs.

Yes, Americans wake up every day thinking "I wonder what the candidates' positions are on the Boyscouts?"

I'm not a supporter of Mitt or the ridiculous attempts to force the Boy Scouts to admit ANY person they don't want to have as a scout leader, but this is probably, oh, #267 on my list of important issues.

20 posted on 07/22/2007 9:22:41 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life, Pro-Legal Immigration, Pro-Victory Bostonian atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

I like Brownback for the most part. His waffling on illegal aliens was very troubling. Brownback is not going to win the nomination, but is he helps eliminate Romney with these types of exposures, he will be serving a very useful purpose.


23 posted on 07/22/2007 9:34:17 PM PDT by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
Brownback is attacking Romney (an Eagle scout and, IIRC, father of 3 more Eagle scouts) on the subject of scouting. Meanwhile Romney continues assault on Democrats. Which candidate is showing that he has what it takes to beat... the Democrats?
26 posted on 07/22/2007 10:00:31 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
Senator BrownSwitchback is overplaying this only a little. But Romney is on public record favoring inclusion of open homosexuals in scouting.

Senator Switchback may damage Romney. But he can't help himself survive Iowa.

We'll bury him in Ames.
29 posted on 07/23/2007 7:41:29 AM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44
This is an old story emanating from social liberals, and it was refuted in December 2006.

It is definitely a slow news cycle. Generally Brody does a decent job of reporting. In this case, he could have done a small amount of checking to find responses like that of Boy Scouts’ spokesperson Caroline Shaw.

First, youth groups, all million or more of them, were not allowed to participate as groups because of—age limits.

Individually many Scout Leaders did participate including the President and CEO of the Scouts—Mitt Romney. Those under 18 participated as individuals online.

Second, Romney supported local councils’ rights to make local decisions and as a Boy Scouts board member he supported the right of the Scouts to decided all issues.

Kennedy and the Boston media used Mitt’s statements to distort his position.

30 posted on 07/23/2007 9:22:47 AM PDT by ridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

...bye, bye. Rommney.


32 posted on 07/23/2007 2:56:58 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (just b/c your paraoid, doesn't mean they're NOT out to get you....run, fred, run. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bnelson44

I’ve kept an open mind on Mitt so far, but this may be a deal breaker for me.


36 posted on 07/23/2007 9:16:23 PM PDT by airborne (http://www.gohunter08.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson