Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(RON PAUL opposes) Administration Plan to Subsidize China’s Nuclear Industry
Human Events ^ | 06/06/2007 | Timothy Carney

Posted on 07/22/2007 2:02:07 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian

Administration Poised to Subsidize China’s Nuclear Industry
by Timothy P. Carney

A Japanese-owned company is building nuclear power plants for Communist China, and the Bush administration is ready to use U.S. taxpayer dollars to subsidize the deal to the tune of $5 billion. Although China’s government-owned nuclear industry has a long record of illegal nuclear deals with Iran and Pakistan, administration officials say the technology is not transferable to nuclear weapons, and that the subsidy will create 5,000 jobs in Pennsylvania.

The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im) is a federal agency that subsidizes U.S. exports by lending taxpayer money to foreign buyers (such as the Chinese government), or guaranteeing private loans, so that the foreign buyer can purchase U.S. goods.

Westinghouse Electric is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Japanese company Toshiba. Westinghouse manufactures the AP 1000 -- a new model of nuclear power generator -- in Monroeville, Pa.

In February 2005, Ex-Im’s board of directors granted preliminary approval for a $5 billion subsidy -- an unspecified combination of loans and guarantees -- to the China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) as a way of aiding Westinghouse’s bid for the contract (a French company and a Russian company were also competing for the contract.)

This year, the Chinese government awarded the contract to Westinghouse, bringing the record subsidy closer to reality, although the preliminary approval does not guarantee Ex-Im will provide financing. A Westinghouse spokesman told HUMAN EVENTS the company was in the process of applying for Ex-Im financing. Ex-Im spokesman Phil Cogan told HUMAN EVENTS that while a preliminary commitment is by no means a promise by Ex-Im, it indicates that “this is the kind of thing” Ex-Im would subsidize.

Congressional critics from both ends of the spectrum, including Senator Bernie Sanders (I.-Vt.) and Republican Representatives Ron Paul (Tex.), Jeff Fortenberry (Neb.), and Ed Royce (Calif.), have resisted this deal.

For the critics, the deal is problematic on at least three fronts. First, China’s state-owned nuclear industry has a long history of illegal nuclear weapons proliferation, and this subsidy enriches that very industry. Second, some of the jobs generated by this record subsidy deal will not be in the U.S. Finally, aiding China’s nuclear power industry could boost its military capabilities including its nuclear submarine programs.

Rewarding Proliferators

The CNNC is the branch of the Chinese government that manages both nuclear weapons and nuclear power. In recent months, CNNC and other state agencies founded the State Nuclear Power Technology Company (SNPTC). SNPTC, entirely owned by the Chinese government, is now the official purchaser of the nuclear reactors from Westinghouse.

CNNC is a known serial proliferator of nuclear weapons materials. In the late 1990s, U.S. intelligence agencies found that the CNNC had sold 5,000 ring magnets to Pakistan’s A.Q. Khan Research Laboratory. Later, the CIA found that the CNNC sold Pakistan high-temperature furnaces. Both the furnaces and the ring magnets are crucial tools used in enriching uranium to produce fissionable -- i.e., weapons grade -- uranium. Shortly after these sales, Pakistan tested its first nuclear weapon.

In 2004, A.Q. Khan, the Pakistani scientist on the buying end of the CNNC’s sales, was arrested for selling centrifuge materials to Libya. Khan is also known to have aided the nuclear weapons programs of North Korea and Iran. CNNC has, on at least two occasions, had dealings with Iran’s nuclear weapons program, but it is not clear if China has ever actually executed a sale of nuclear weapons materials to Iran.

American Jobs?

Westinghouse and Ex-Im officials have defended this subsidy by pointing out that without it, China would still build the nuclear power plants, but in collaboration with the Russians or the French. By greasing the skids for the Westinghouse contract with its preliminary commitment in 2005, Ex-Im has helped make work for 5,000 manufacturing workers in Monroeville, Pa. In April, however, Westinghouse announced that portions of the power plants would be built in South Korea and other parts in China. Ex-Im cannot finance an export unless most of the goods are made in the U.S.

Westinghouse and the Bush administration point out, however, that if these cutting-edge reactors do well in China, it would spur domestic and world-wide business for Westinghouse, making more jobs in Pennsylvania.

Helping China’s Military?

In late May, Representatives Christopher Smith (R.-N.J.), Diane Watson (D.-Calif.), Fortenberry, and Royce, asked Secretary of Defense Robert Gates in a letter whether the sale could boost China’s military capabilities.

Henry Sokolski, executive director of the Nonproliferation Policy Education Center said that there are reasons to worry about providing China with this technology. “You’re building an infrastructure that can be used and retooled to help out in [China’s] naval reactor sector -- and they do want this for nuclear subs,” the Christian Science Monitor quoted Sokolski.

Last year, during the debate on reauthorizing Ex-Im, the House passed by a 331-to-114 vote an amendment by Representatives Paul and Sanders that would have blocked a subsidy for this deal. The measure, however, was not in the final bill.

As of Tuesday morning, Ex-Im had not yet received an application from Westinghouse or any of its partners with regard to the sale. Sanders, Paul, or Fortenberry will likely act once Ex-Im receives the application, and possibly hold hearings on the deal, which would be the largest subsidy in Ex-Im history.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: china; energy; geopolitics; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 next last
To: George W. Bush

great points.

as he gets more and more popular, the more the media and the establishment will try to tear him down.

i supported w twice like i did his pop. the first cast i voted for prez was reagan.

time for us all to drop the name callings and dividing the country and concentrate on who really is sticking it to us and do something about it.


121 posted on 07/22/2007 6:24:45 PM PDT by rineaux (I Refuse to comment on this post until I know what Jesse Jackson Thinks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Puddleglum
Whew, such a cult of defenders Ron Paul has. I may be wrong. Maybe he’s not an associate of Nazi types. Maybe it’s just a coincidence that they quote him so much and reprint his articles. Maybe he doesn’t smoke dope either, but something about him appeals to dope smokers. Maybe he doesn’t have anything against America. It’s just that those who do are attracted to him. Maybe he’s not anti-military, but those who are are attracted to him. Maybe he’s not pro-Gay, but those who are like his stands. But hey, relax. You’re a little too serious about the great man. Try to lighten up.
122 posted on 07/22/2007 6:40:37 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: rineaux
as he gets more and more popular, the more the media and the establishment will try to tear him down.

Candidates like Rudi (and maybe Romney) will deflate, having thought Bush had turned us all into liberals. The others, FDT especially, will realize that the old Reagan/Goldwater message of small-government and liberty and pro-life/pro-family really is still a winner. And after 2006, we'd better find a winning message. Well, just return to that message that is made us winners before.

Ron Paul is already pulling the party to the Right, no matter how much they try to pretend otherwise.
123 posted on 07/22/2007 6:40:55 PM PDT by George W. Bush (Rudy: tough on terror, scared of Iowa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: BlackbirdSST

Kneepads??? Are you one of Ron Paul’s Gay supporters?


124 posted on 07/22/2007 6:41:53 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

Is it the same cranks and weirdos or is this cult breaking out into a wider audience of True Believers.


125 posted on 07/22/2007 6:43:54 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker

It’s like talking to people in a cult. I cannot believe they’re this devout about the man who is either a tool of the Left or simply a naive to the point of not realizing that ideas have consequences.


126 posted on 07/22/2007 6:45:31 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

He won’t even be president, so what type he’ll be is irrelevant. How would you get the majority of Americans to vote for him? You realize that’s required, don’t you?


127 posted on 07/22/2007 6:48:48 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
He won’t even be president, so what type he’ll be is irrelevant. How would you get the majority of Americans to vote for him? You realize that’s required, don’t you?

Ron Paul enjoys significant Independent and even libertarian-leaning Democrat cross-over support. I don't see many of the other GOP candidates drawing that sort of support from "across the fence".

128 posted on 07/22/2007 6:53:56 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

What would a number be that is significant? Enough to get Hillary elected? I am so reminded of Perot when I hear this stuff that I really hope people can remember the baleful effect that that enthusiasm led to.


129 posted on 07/22/2007 6:55:44 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
What would a number be that is significant? Enough to get Hillary elected? I am so reminded of Perot when I hear this stuff that I really hope people can remember the baleful effect that that enthusiasm led to.

Except that Paul is not running Third Party. He is running as a Republican. Obviously, any Republican candidate should hope to get Independent and even Democrat cross-over support.

130 posted on 07/22/2007 7:01:27 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian (Please Ping or FReepMail me to be added to the Great Ron Paul Ping List)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: BnBlFlag
Paul does not copyright his writings and they can be published by anyone. He does not write “for” them.

Facts don't matter to the Paul bashers.

131 posted on 07/22/2007 7:05:27 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian

From dope smokers, anti-Semites, Gays, anarchists, anti-defense Liberals and Conservatives, radical isolationists, and others? Come on. America isn’t perfect, but it’s not time to throw in the towel, get stoned, and turn the world over to the Islamists Nazis abroad and the skin heads at home. Libertarianism that leads to anti-Americanism is no virtue.


132 posted on 07/22/2007 7:05:34 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: BlackbirdSST

Heh, sorry, wrong thread!


133 posted on 07/22/2007 7:09:40 PM PDT by TypeZoNegative (Trinidad&Tobago: Proof that a Muslim minority (5%pop) causes a majority of a country's problems.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
You can bash Bush all you want, but he’s one thing Ron Paul will never be: President of the United States of America.

Doesn't matter, he's already accomplished one of his goals - addressing the need to maintain our Constitution and our sovereignty. And big government.

If Paul goes deep in the primaries, the other candidates will have no choice but to address some of his ideas. And Paul has a huge cross-section of voters, lots of independents out there. People who were disgusted with the political process or never paid attention to politics are now supporting him.

His legacy is already sealed. Paul is already one of the most honorable Congressmen of all time.

134 posted on 07/22/2007 7:10:06 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
You can bash Bush all you want, but he’s one thing Ron Paul will never be: President of the United States of America.

So was Bill Clinton.

135 posted on 07/22/2007 7:12:03 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
What would a number be that is significant? Enough to get Hillary elected?

How would a vote for Paul get Hillary elected? Or do you know so little that you don't even realize he is running in the GOP primary?

136 posted on 07/22/2007 7:13:57 PM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

Agreed. Not necessarily something to be proud.


137 posted on 07/22/2007 7:14:07 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: elhombrelibre
How would you get the majority of Americans to vote for him?

Are you kidding. He has total cross-over appeal. Both the right and the left are supporting Paul.

Paul will go deep in the primaries and he'll force the leading GOP candidates to acknowledge the real issues.

138 posted on 07/22/2007 7:16:59 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Because ultimately, most American voters will see him as profoundly irresponsible. You can insult me all you want, but that’s the way I’m sure it’d work out. And the fact that so many people here who are his followers can only insult me and not explain these eccentricities of Ron Paul mean that he’ll end up torn to pieces in a general election once the press is done puffing him up so he could harm the Republican Party.
139 posted on 07/22/2007 7:17:17 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Well, I’m done discussing this. I don’t think he’s going to win a single state. If I’m wrong, you can remind me of it.


140 posted on 07/22/2007 7:18:20 PM PDT by elhombrelibre (Who will Liberals shift the blame to if their retreat from Iraq turns into a disaster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson