Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bill Would De-fund Two Agents' Prison Terms
Washington Times ^ | July 21, 2007 | Jerry Seper

Posted on 07/22/2007 10:12:02 AM PDT by DogByte6RER

Bill would de-fund two agents' prison terms

July 21, 2007

By Jerry Seper - A Republican congressman yesterday said he will offer an amendment to an annual spending bill to prevent the Bush administration from using funds to enforce the prison sentences of two U.S. Border Patrol agents.

Rep. Tom Tancredo of Colorado said the amendment would force the release of Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean, who were sentenced to 11- and 12-year prison terms for shooting a fleeing drug-smuggling suspect in the buttocks.

"Americans have been waiting months for the president to right this wrong and I am not going to wait any longer," said Mr. Tancredo, a candidate for president in 2008. "It's time that the Congress took matters into its own hands.

"This kangaroo court in Texas has made a decision, but Congress is under no obligation to provide the administration with the funds they need to enforce it," he said.

Also yesterday, Rep. John Culberson, Texas Republican, and 20 House colleagues sent a letter to President Bush asking that he immediately commute the sentences of the agents, saying they were "unjustly prosecuted for doing their job."

"It is unacceptable that a federal prosecutor would take the word of a known drug smuggler over the testimony of two officers protecting our country," Mr. Culberson said. "This case has created a chilling effect along the border, and law-enforcement personnel tell me they are now hesitant to draw their weapons."

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; borderpatrol; compean; congress; govwatch; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; illegals; immigrantlist; immigration; johnnysutton; pardonthemnow; ramos; tancredo; tr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-237 next last
Good for Tom Tancredo!

From the artcile, the others who signed the letter to President Bush for the commutation of both Ramos and Compean are:

Texas Reps. Michael C. Burgess, John Carter, Michael K. Conaway, Louie Gohmert, Kay Granger, Ralph M. Hall, Kenny Marchant, Michael McCaul, Pete Sessions and Ted Poe; California Reps. Brian P. Bilbray, Wally Herger, Dana Rohrabacher and Ed Royce; and Reps. Mary Fallin of Oklahoma, Virgil H. Goode Jr. of Virginia, Walter B. Jones of North Carolina, Mike Rogers of Michigan, Cliff Stearns of Florida and Joe Wilson of South Carolina.

1 posted on 07/22/2007 10:12:04 AM PDT by DogByte6RER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

This appears to be a violation of the separation of powers. It is exactly the sort of thing that we decry when done by the judiciary.


2 posted on 07/22/2007 10:15:06 AM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

Can Congress really “de-fund” the prison sentences of specific individuals? Even if it’s warranted in this case, I’m not sure I like the precedent; imagine the possibilities.


3 posted on 07/22/2007 10:15:27 AM PDT by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

This seems like a slippery slope. We bitch and moan that the Dims can’t prosecute a war by committee and then one of our own does essentially the same thing.


4 posted on 07/22/2007 10:18:24 AM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

Why doesn’t Bush just commute their sentences?

How else do you get through to someone who has a skull as thick as Bush?


5 posted on 07/22/2007 10:21:04 AM PDT by common denominator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
It wont work. The guys sentences are way too harsh but destroying the separation of powers concept is going too far. This, if it succeeded, would justify the same Congress to defund any aspect of any other branch of government. Effectively neutering the other two.
6 posted on 07/22/2007 10:21:43 AM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

I’d say this effort has severe constitutional flaws.


7 posted on 07/22/2007 10:22:29 AM PDT by Petronski (Just say no to Rudy McRomney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

No, No, No, No.

No matter how noble the goal may be, we cannot allow this.


8 posted on 07/22/2007 10:24:42 AM PDT by Lost Dutchman ("Weep for the future Na'Toth, Weep for us all." (G'Kar-Babylon 5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Our elected officials have no clue about the constitution.


9 posted on 07/22/2007 10:25:42 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
Why doesn't he pull an all-nighter and really show-em.

Tancredo is correct in trying to help these agents but using stupid leftist "Strategery" isn't going to do it.
10 posted on 07/22/2007 10:28:11 AM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paul51

I think you’re right. Dumb stunt on Tancredo’s part.


11 posted on 07/22/2007 10:28:45 AM PDT by Clara Lou (Thompson-Hunter '08-- imwithfred.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neodad

In this case it needs to be done, and should be far more often. No less than Justice A. Kennedy recently said that many of the mandatory have gone way over the top. The pardon was established for such purposes but, as he made sure to point out, it’s not being used. Something needs to be done to establish a fair system and if this is the way to start, then it’s a start.


12 posted on 07/22/2007 10:29:17 AM PDT by Yomin Postelnik (Want a candidate who stands up for conservative principles instead of apologizing? gohunter08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER
11- and 12-year prison terms for shooting a fleeing drug-smuggling suspect in the buttocks.

Why not have these guys re-sentenced to time-served? The cops aren't supposed to shoot somebody who is running, but it appears to me that they aren't guilty of anything more than assault. (If it were attempted murder, it would've been a head or back shot.)

If you look at the sentences and/or penalties handed out to police officers for assault or a non-fatal shooting that violated policy, I'll bet the farm that they didn't get 12-year sentences. I've seen cops do a lot worse and get a fine, probation, and firing from the police force.

13 posted on 07/22/2007 10:29:31 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Sharpei diem -- Seize the wrinkled dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Federal Minimum Sentencing Guidelines. That’s the true problem.


14 posted on 07/22/2007 10:31:27 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

Sometimes they go to Atlanta and shoot old women.


15 posted on 07/22/2007 10:32:20 AM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen

Congress holds the purse. This is exactly how it’s supposed to work - according to the Constitution itself!


16 posted on 07/22/2007 10:33:27 AM PDT by the anti-liberal (OUR schools are damaging OUR children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Yomin Postelnik
No less than Justice A. Kennedy recently said that many of the mandatory have gone way over the top.

Then let Tancredo offer legislation to reduce the mandatory sentencing minimums. This is nothing more than a stunt, and one that isn't even grounded in the Constitution (or common sense) at that.

17 posted on 07/22/2007 10:34:43 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DogByte6RER

What would it take for Bush to just step in and say, look, the 10-year enhancement for using a gun doesn’t apply to law enforcement doing their jobs. I’m throwing that part of their sentence out. That leaves a 1-year and a 2-year sentence, with part of that time already served, and with good behavior and the proven fact that they are in danger and being inadequately protected while in prison, I think it’s time to let these men go with a written citation. That is, if my good dear friend and upstanding guy Johnny Sutton lets me do that. I’ll have to clear it with him first.


18 posted on 07/22/2007 10:35:49 AM PDT by Sender (Be subtle! Be subtle! And use your squirrels for every kind of business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lost Dutchman
I agree, the government already does this to the states and I usually don't agree with it. When Wyoming decided not to raise the drinking age from 19 to 21 in lock-step with the other states, Congress twisted that state's arm by informing them that their highway construction and repair projects would not be funded. It was pure and simple nanny-state coercion, and it was accomplished by refusing to fund a totally unrelated area of the state's budget. I didn't agree with that tactic then and I don't agree with it now. Republican or Democrat, it isn't right.

Tancredo needs to find another avenue to get this done or he'll be opening the floodgates to a bunch of DemonRats who already connive with organizations whose only job 24/7 is to find avenues like this to force agendas on unwilling people and state/local governments.

Be careful what you wish for, Mr. Tancredo. You won't like it when the Congressional DemonRats start freeing environmental "activists" (that is, domestic terrorists) who burn down ski areas and SUV dealerships, coke dealers who stuff campaign coffers with laundered money, and illegal aliens who deal drugs, live in gangs, and commit identity theft.

19 posted on 07/22/2007 10:44:57 AM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Sharpei diem -- Seize the wrinkled dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan

Maybe the MSM could take up a collection from KC, Juan, Dan Rather, et. al. to help pay for the continued incarceration.


20 posted on 07/22/2007 10:45:13 AM PDT by Paladin2 (Islam is the religion of violins, NOT peas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-237 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson