[ovrtaxt]

yep, it’s about globalism in the final analysis. The reason I don’t support Thompson is his lack of copnviction regarding an ever closer union with Canada and Mexico- even if it only consists of trade agreements- for right now, of course. (The EU started the same way.)

Paul and Hunter both are not globalists in any measure of the word.

[ejonesie22]

Yeah I know all the arguments. Been there, done that. I am sorry but that’s what will get Paul and Hunter in the end. There is nothing wrong with globalism if it is practiced correctly, and I hate to tell anyone but that Jeanie is not going back in the bottle. We are way past that now. That may not sit well with many, but it’s a fact, brought on primarily by the very technology you are using now.

Not being globalist in any sense of the word on one end and extremely “Internationalist” on the other will not work. We have to deal with the global economy. It will not go a way. Now our job is to define it in terms we can live with. We can’t do that if we are not there to play and play to win. We have to turn their ideas and practices to our advantage and will. That is the challenge for Conservatives in the 21st Century.

[Fester Chugabrew]

Globalism? We have to accept the fact that the rights we enjoy have been bestowed from Above. As such they do not end where our borders end. These ideals will, and do, hold sway in many places where we wish peacefully to do business, even if it means doing business with people who differ significantly in what it means to be “free.”

There are good business people in these countries you may, at least on the surface, despise. If a few of them want to raise chickens in their backyard or rebuild engines on their kitchen tables I have no problem with that (within reason).

If there were a way to equitably equalize the disparities evidenced in Mexican and (less pronouncedly) Canadian economic practices, then there is little reason to discourage a more transparent relationship between the three. The natural resources north and south of us are incredible, and the people on either side are, by and large, not nearly as stupid as liberal Democrats.

[nicmarlo]

it’s about globalism in the final analysis. The reason I don’t support Thompson is his lack of copnviction regarding an ever closer union with Canada and Mexico- even if it only consists of trade agreements- for right now, of course. (The EU started the same way.)

Paul and Hunter both are not globalists in any measure of the word.

Exactly. And I want absolutely NOTHING to do with becoming even more dependent upon GLOBALIST IDEALS.....save for Paul and Hunter, I don't see any other candidate keeping us safe from a North American Union. NAFTA has already proven to be a failure, yet it continues to enlarge.

The NAU, part and parcel of the globalist's goal, is NOT in the best interest of a healthy, sovereign America.