Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are Some Ideas Too Dangerous to Discuss?
Reason ^ | July 20, 2007 | Ronald Bailey

Posted on 07/20/2007 9:22:09 PM PDT by Lorianne

In a fascinating op/ed, Harvard cognitive scientist, Steven Pinker, lists a number of taboo ideas that have been soundly denounced by various people. To wit:

Do women, on average, have a different profile of aptitudes and emotions than men?

Were the events in the Bible fictitious -- not just the miracles, but those involving kings and empires?

Has the state of the environment improved in the last 50 years?

Do most victims of sexual abuse suffer no lifelong damage?

Did Native Americans engage in genocide and despoil the landscape?

Do men have an innate tendency to rape?

Did the crime rate go down in the 1990s because two decades earlier poor women aborted children who would have been prone to violence?

Are suicide terrorists well-educated, mentally healthy and morally driven?

Would the incidence of rape go down if prostitution were legalized?

Do African-American men have higher levels of testosterone, on average, than white men?

Is morality just a product of the evolution of our brains, with no inherent reality?

Would society be better off if heroin and cocaine were legalized?

Is homosexuality the symptom of an infectious disease?

Would it be consistent with our moral principles to give parents the option of euthanizing newborns with birth defects that would consign them to a life of pain and disability?

Do parents have any effect on the character or intelligence of their children?

Have religions killed a greater proportion of people than Nazism?

Would damage from terrorism be reduced if the police could torture suspects in special circumstances?

Would Africa have a better chance of rising out of poverty if it hosted more polluting industries or accepted Europe's nuclear waste?

Is the average intelligence of Western nations declining because duller people are having more children than smarter people?

Would unwanted children be better off if there were a market in adoption rights, with babies going to the highest bidder?

Would lives be saved if we instituted a free market in organs for transplantation?

Should people have the right to clone themselves, or enhance the genetic traits of their children?

Pinker suggests that many readers will be appalled by some of these questions. I personally find most of them interesting. He continues:

By "dangerous ideas" I don't have in mind harmful technologies, like those behind weapons of mass destruction, or evil ideologies, like those of racist, fascist or other fanatical cults. I have in mind statements of fact or policy that are defended with evidence and argument by serious scientists and thinkers but which are felt to challenge the collective decency of an age. The ideas listed above, and the moral panic that each one of them has incited during the past quarter century, are examples. Writers who have raised ideas like these have been vilified, censored, fired, threatened and in some cases physically assaulted.

While people of good will can disagree, I believe that there are no dangerous truths. It is always better to know than to remain ignorant. For the sake of argument, Pinker entertains the notion that some ideas may, indeed, be too dangerous to air publicly. Why? Perhaps because malevolent people may seize on the ideas to justify harming other people or groups. He also properly urges us to be "suspicious when the danger in a dangerous idea is to someone other than its advocate."

But in the end, Pinker concludes:

Though I am more sympathetic to the argument that important ideas be aired than to the argument that they should sometimes be suppressed, I think it is a debate we need to have. Whether we like it or not, science has a habit of turning up discomfiting thoughts, and the Internet has a habit of blowing their cover.

I am very proud to say that reason does not shy away from taboo topics such as, organ transplant markets, legalizing drugs, the improving natural environment, economic development in Africa, and genetic enhancement, to name a few.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: freespeech; inquiry; taboos; truth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
The questions themselves are less interesting to me than the issue of "dangerous ideas" in general. No matter what community you frequent (on the internet or anywhere else) there are certain ideas that are taboo to bring up.

From that standpoint, I found the article interesting.

1 posted on 07/20/2007 9:22:13 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
The whole concept behind PC is that there are ideas which are too dangerous to even bring up, because The Wrong People will hear them and Start Thinking About Them.

It's anti-intellectualism at its most basic, and it's being pushed by the supposed intellectuals.

2 posted on 07/20/2007 9:25:26 PM PDT by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life, Pro-Legal Immigration, Pro-Victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve; Lorianne

Oh my, so many questions and you are going to get a LOT of answers, lol.


3 posted on 07/20/2007 9:26:07 PM PDT by potlatch (MIZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MIKAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_MAZARU_ooo_‹(•¿•)›_ooo_))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

he was smart enough to stay away from the homosexual agenda.


4 posted on 07/20/2007 9:27:55 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Would the world be better off if Islam were banned or destroyed?


5 posted on 07/20/2007 9:28:33 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Is is permissible to say “niggardly”?


6 posted on 07/20/2007 9:29:28 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

No, he asked a question about it .


7 posted on 07/20/2007 9:29:58 PM PDT by Neu Pragmatist (Don't forget to thank the good Senators who stopped Amnesty .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

What’s the problem here? The answer to all the questions is “yes.”


8 posted on 07/20/2007 9:30:23 PM PDT by Enterprise (I can't talk about liberals anymore because some of the words will get me sent to rehab.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Neu Pragmatist

I should have read more carefully


9 posted on 07/20/2007 9:31:23 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Anyway but Washington, DC. ;-)


10 posted on 07/20/2007 9:32:26 PM PDT by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
While many of these question to some existent are dangerous. Questioning which side of the church should the piano is on is above most.
11 posted on 07/20/2007 9:33:40 PM PDT by ThomasThomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

there are threads on this forum that i avoid.


12 posted on 07/20/2007 9:34:24 PM PDT by ken21 ( b 4 fred.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Pinging myself for later


13 posted on 07/20/2007 9:34:30 PM PDT by GOP_Raider (Your one stop shop for all your useless information needs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

The ideas sounded fairly mainstream; that was the odd thing.


14 posted on 07/20/2007 9:34:33 PM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Absopostilutely


15 posted on 07/20/2007 9:35:53 PM PDT by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
From what I know of Pinker, this (Would it be consistent with our moral principles to give parents the option of euthanizing newborns with birth defects that would consign them to a life of pain and disability?) is the "baby" being hidden in all this bathwater.
16 posted on 07/20/2007 9:36:43 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

They are very interesting questions indeed .


17 posted on 07/20/2007 9:37:17 PM PDT by Neu Pragmatist (Don't forget to thank the good Senators who stopped Amnesty .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Do women, on average, have a different profile of aptitudes and emotions than men? Quite obviously Yes. With emphasis on the “on average.” This fact tells us nothing about any individual man or woman.

Were the events in the Bible fictitious — not just the miracles, but those involving kings and empires? Most appear to be quite accurate. At least as accurate as most other “history” from that time.

Has the state of the environment improved in the last 50 years? In some ways Yes, some ways No.

Do most victims of sexual abuse suffer no lifelong damage? I hope so, but have never seen any genuine statistics. Most people seem to assume they do.

Did Native Americans engage in genocide and despoil the landscape? When they got the chaance, like all other human groups.

Do men have an innate tendency to rape? Yep. Most of us wouldn’t dream of letting the tendency out to play.

Did the crime rate go down in the 1990s because two decades earlier poor women aborted children who would have been prone to violence? Nope.

Are suicide terrorists well-educated, mentally healthy and morally driven? Often Yes. No. Depends on your definition of “moral.”

Would the incidence of rape go down if prostitution were legalized? No.


18 posted on 07/20/2007 9:38:13 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (It's not the heat, it's the stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

They obviously left out a couple questions that are too taboo even for this discussion.


19 posted on 07/20/2007 9:39:25 PM PDT by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Aside from the occasional "No, thanks" from the Mods, I haven't noticed the FR community shying away from very many subjects...
20 posted on 07/20/2007 9:39:51 PM PDT by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson