If I’m not mistaken, the “traveling exhibit” from the Smithsonian has a great collection of some of the historical clothing our First Ladies wore at one time or another. It has all of these gorgeous ball gowns, Abigail Adams’ yellow “dancing shoes” and some of the cool clothes Jackie Kennedy wore, etc.
And then it has ‘The Beast’s’ green pantsuit which was the predecessor to ‘Old Crusty,’ her black pantsuit, LOL!
I’m sure Eleanor Roosevelt’s sensible, orthopedic clodhoppers are in there, too. ;)
http://www.pghhistory.org/first_ladies.asp
I’m no “fashionista” myself, but Jeeze Louise! If that’s not a statement, I don’t know what is.
I will admit though, that ‘She Who Shall Not Be Named’ looked nearly human in that midnight blue gown she wore for her (pseudo) husband’s first Inaugural Ball.
Must’ve been a body double. ;)
I wonder when the MSM is going to investigate Hillary’s ‘channeling Eleanor Roosevelt’. She talks with the dead. She says Eleanor talked to her. Does anyone out there see this as a problem in reality perceptions for her to become the leader of this country? This is evidence of serious altered state of consiousness. She told us and was serious. The MSM got after Mrs. Reagan about astrology, but not Hillary and her necromancy. When are real, hard questions going to be asked of Hillary. The woman wants to be President of the United States. This isn’t a run for High School Student President. When is someone serious going to ask about Broderick, Wiley, Lewenski, and the rest and ask why she feels she needs to say nothing about it when women are accosted, raped, attempted sodomiezed, and generally groped by the person she claims is the closest to her in this world? Why would any woman vote for her? Why does she believe she is the best qualified to command the armed services? When are real questions going to be asked?