Skip to comments.
Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq
The Whitehouse ^
| today
| W
Posted on 07/19/2007 1:17:36 PM PDT by Rodney King
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-126 next last
To: frithguild
Would you translate please?
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
81
posted on
07/19/2007 3:21:27 PM PDT
by
LonePalm
(Commander and Chef)
To: HOTTIEBOY
“I am setting in a cubicle diagnosing a mans computer fault codes in his car from 600 miles away and typing in a forum. Thats why I dont judge things like this. Cawz I dont know what or why it was done. I do know that it was done by people a hellofa lot smarter than me.”
And that amnesty thing! Those guys are so much smarter than us. And busting the federal budget. Because they are such freaking geniuses.
To: Rodney King
Executive Orders are typically implementation documents as to how the executive departments are going to actually implement and apply broad Congressional Acts through the departments.
The Iraq War resolutions, the WOT Acts and the financial acts passed against Muslim terrorism are very broadly written.
To actually seize the assets etc, the Departments need procedures. Those procedures are always outline in Executive Orders for these types of broad acts where the Executive is OBLIGATED to carry out the intent of the Legislative Branch, on-the-fly against changing circumstances.
The President with the EO is merely broadening other orders to hit (IMHO) those undermining the new government, where before it was only set up against the Muslim terror groups.
This whole thread is a tempest in a teapot. These EOs in the Clinton era were just as scary in the raw wording.
83
posted on
07/19/2007 4:44:40 PM PDT
by
KC Burke
(Men of intemperate minds can never be free...their passions forge their fetters.)
To: mnehrling; Rodney King
...we should fight to have people in power who we trust with Unitary Executive Powers...
Did you really type that? OK, let me know when Jesus Christ is on the ballot, otherwise, you're nutz! Blackbird.
84
posted on
07/19/2007 5:14:01 PM PDT
by
BlackbirdSST
(I'm dug in, giving no more ground to the rino stampede. BB)
To: BlackbirdSST
OK, let me know when Jesus Christ is on the ballot, otherwise, you're nutz! Exactly.
85
posted on
07/19/2007 5:59:08 PM PDT
by
Rodney King
(No, we can't all just get along.)
To: BlackbirdSST
I take it you’ve never heard of Unitary Executive Theory?
86
posted on
07/19/2007 6:15:07 PM PDT
by
mnehring
(Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit)
To: mnehrling
I take it youve never heard of Unitary Executive Theory?
No, what I've never heard of is the kind of trust one would have to muster to believe in it. Blackbird.
87
posted on
07/19/2007 6:55:40 PM PDT
by
BlackbirdSST
(I'm dug in, giving no more ground to the rino stampede. BB)
To: BlackbirdSST
If you’ve never heard of it, then how do you know “what kind of trust’ it gives?
88
posted on
07/20/2007 6:32:52 AM PDT
by
mnehring
(Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit)
To: SubGeniusX; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
![]( http://www.triplettschool.org/pages/images/a_statlib.gif)
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
89
posted on
07/20/2007 6:50:00 AM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
To: mnehrling
If youve never heard of it, then how do you know what kind of trust it gives?
"NO" meant your assumption was wrong, but you knew that. Blackbird.
90
posted on
07/20/2007 7:08:57 AM PDT
by
BlackbirdSST
(I'm dug in, giving no more ground to the rino stampede. BB)
To: Rodney King
This guy is WAY out of line on this.
91
posted on
07/20/2007 7:11:22 AM PDT
by
WhiteGuy
(GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
To: absolootezer0
so hes going after about half of congress, right? Bush said once "if you're not for us, you're against us". Eagerly waiting for this to play out.
92
posted on
07/20/2007 7:13:47 AM PDT
by
Fitzcarraldo
(Skip the Moon, go for Mars)
To: taxcontrol
Hey, it works for the EPA. They don’t “take” your property, they just block you from using it. And we’re all for that, eh?
93
posted on
07/20/2007 7:15:57 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: frithguild; LonePalm
Ping me too when you get here Frith!
(is this because of Harry Reid pulling the defense funding???)
94
posted on
07/20/2007 7:20:43 AM PDT
by
Calpernia
(Breederville.com)
To: Rodney King
At first- I thought this was a joke.
I’m no lawyer- but this seems an extreme furtherance of...something that I don’t “get”. What is he REALLY doing here? And is it constitutional?
95
posted on
07/20/2007 7:25:50 AM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
To: Bahbah
What does this mean, actually?
96
posted on
07/20/2007 7:34:48 AM PDT
by
SE Mom
(Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet -Fred'08)
To: WhiteGuy
After re-reading..............
it sure seems that Präsident Busch has just given himself the power to freeze the assets of anyone whom he feels is a “threat” to his foreign policy, which could include any individual, company or organization that dares to speak out against his policies.
pretty scary, just ask yourself, do you want hillary to have this power?
97
posted on
07/20/2007 7:38:49 AM PDT
by
WhiteGuy
(GOP Congress - 16,000 earmarks costing US $50 billion in 2006 - PAUL2008)
To: Rodney King
Scary. A lot of Saudi money could be impounded. Buy a horse before the rush, and take good care of. It may be a while before we get the cajones to seize their oil fields...
98
posted on
07/20/2007 7:46:36 AM PDT
by
tracer
To: Rodney King
“The question is, who decides who is helping terrorists?”
The self-proclaimed “Decider”. And to those who think anyone who questions this E.O. is a terrorist sympathiser, guilty of “Sedition”, etc, just remember, if this isn’t struck down, a Dem president can do it just as easily in the future.
“Alex, I’ll take Bananna Republics for $500, please”
To: taxcontrol
The connection to the Fifth Amendment can be summarized in two words and three letters: “tax returns” and “IRS”...
100
posted on
07/20/2007 7:52:34 AM PDT
by
tracer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-126 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson