Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Churchill Not Relevant Enough
campusreportonline.net ^ | July 18, 2007 | Don Irvine

Posted on 07/19/2007 7:46:47 AM PDT by Kaput

Churchill Not Relevant Enough by: Don Irvine, July 18, 2007

Sir Winston Churchill may have been voted the best Briton ever, but if a national curriculum proposal is approved the former Prime Minister will be relegated to the dust bin of history as he will be removed from a list of figures that secondary school children must learn about in Great Britain.

In a move to bring the national curriculum into the 21st century Churchill will no longer be taught and will be replaced with the more relevant topics of as drug and alcohol abuse, climate change (global warming) and genetically modified foods.

This move has angered many in the U.K. including Churchill's grandson Tory MP Nicholas Soames who called the proposal "total madness."

That sentiment was echoed by schools secretary Ed Balls who said that "Churchill should be taught to all pupils and I shall be taking steps to ensure it is."

Good for secretary Balls, but short of a massive public outcry he may be facing an uphill battle.

Churchill once said that "History will be written by the victors." He was right, but he never imagined that the victors would be politically correct educators within his own country that are rewriting it and erasing his legacy.

Don Irvine is the chairman of both Accuracy in Media and Accuracy in Academia.

If you would like to comment on this article, please e-mail mal.kline@academia.org


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: academia; education; history; miseducation; stupidity

1 posted on 07/19/2007 7:46:50 AM PDT by Kaput
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaput

Living on a Thin Line - Ray Davies

All the stories have been told
Of kings and days of old,
But there’s no England now.
All the wars that were won and lost
Somehow don’t seem to matter very much anymore.
All the lies we were told,
All the lies of the people running round,
They’re castles have burned.
Now I see change,
But inside we’re the same as we ever were.

Living on a thin line,
Tell me now, what are we supposed to do?
Living on a thin line,
Tell me now, what are we supposed to do?
Living on a thin line,
Living this way, each day is a dream.
What am I, what are we supposed to do?
Living on a thin line,
Tell me now, what are we supposed to do?

Now another century nearly gone,
What are we gonna leave for the young?
What we couldn’t do, what we wouldn’t do,
It’s a crime, but does it matter?
Does it matter much, does it matter much to you?
Does it ever really matter?
Yes, it really, really matters.

Living on a thin line,
Tell me now, what are we supposed to do?
Living on a thin line,
Tell me now, what are we supposed to do?

Now another leader says
Break their hearts and break some heads.
Is there nothing we can say or do?
Blame the future on the past,
Always lost in blood and guts.
And when they’re gone, it’s me and you.

Living on a thin line,
Tell me now, what are we supposed to do?
Living on a thin line,
Tell me now, what are we supposed to do?
Living on a thin line.


2 posted on 07/19/2007 7:49:28 AM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaput

This fits the general trend: do not revere great statesmen of the past except to the extent they spoke out against racism or advocated socialism.


3 posted on 07/19/2007 7:50:21 AM PDT by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty

Without the Churchill family there would be no England.


4 posted on 07/19/2007 7:51:35 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaput

English bureaucrats should just go ahead and implement their Complete Dhimmitude Program and replace Churchill w/ a picture of the Bomb-turban-MoHAMmed.


5 posted on 07/19/2007 7:56:07 AM PDT by kromike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy
Without the Churchill family there would be no England.

Considering his actions before WWII and his involvement in WWI (not to mention his involvement in laying the groundwork for the welfare state currently in the UK) because of Churchill, England (and the rest of the UK) have gone a track much different than they could have.

6 posted on 07/19/2007 7:58:56 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaput

This should be no surprise. It makes perfect sense that a nation waving the surrender flag would not be interested in former citizens who would have instead yelled, “charge!”


7 posted on 07/19/2007 8:02:31 AM PDT by newguy357
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaput

Nothing like not teaching them about one of the reasons they’re still their own country. Pretty soon they’ll cease teaching about WWI.


8 posted on 07/19/2007 8:02:56 AM PDT by wastedyears (Freedom is the right of all sentient beings - Peter Cullen as Optimus Prime)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaput; Eaker; humblegunner; TheMom; pax_et_bonum; Allegra; weegee; wolfcreek; GulfBreeze

History will be kind to me for I intend to write it. — Sir Winston Churchill


And others, after you are gone, and unable (and other un-willing) to defend (your)self will re-write it...

“You can live a long life with books full of accolades and all sorts of “attaboy’s”, but just one “Awwww, Crap!” and thts all anyone really wants to remember...” — Stevie-D


9 posted on 07/19/2007 8:10:57 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaput

Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say, ‘Huh? What are you talking about?’


10 posted on 07/19/2007 8:12:11 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (May the heirs of Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski rise up again to defend Europe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears

Today’s socialism in the UK is laid at the feet of Winston Churchill? It is true that England suffered bombings in WWII, and the country needed help to heal post war, but into whose hands did the country fall after that? One way Satan steals ambition, patriotism and hope is to remove all heroes. It happens in our own country for the same reasons by the same entity.


11 posted on 07/19/2007 8:15:04 AM PDT by Paperdoll ( Vote for Duncan Hunter in the Primaries for America's sake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaput

It’s really bizarre to me, but my impression is that in spite of the polls you see, Churchill was never really appreciated in Great Britain the way he should have been. He basically got booted out of office after the war was over.


12 posted on 07/19/2007 8:21:45 AM PDT by jpl (Dear Al Gore: it's 3:00 A.M., do you know where your drug addicted son is?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll
Today’s socialism in the UK is laid at the feet of Winston Churchill?

Along with entry of the US into WWI after he became Lord of the Admiralty. As Lord of the Admiralty it can not be dismissed that Churchill, while perhaps not complicit, knew full well of the impending fate of the Lusitania and what dead Americans could mean for the British cause.

13 posted on 07/19/2007 8:29:26 AM PDT by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaput

“In a move to bring the national curriculum into the 21st century Churchill will no longer be taught and will be replaced with the more relevant topics”....Oh brother! If the Nazis had overun Britian maybe he would be more relevant? What a discrace for the Churchill family!


14 posted on 07/19/2007 8:33:32 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaput

Secretary Balls? Sometimes, for some, life is cruel.


15 posted on 07/19/2007 8:38:27 AM PDT by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaput

All this “history” stuff... it’s all just so old and out of date.


16 posted on 07/19/2007 8:46:50 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

“There is no England now” — gets truer every day, especially if they trash their own best selves in the history books (and that was Dave Davies who wrote that, btw, to give the little brother his due.)


17 posted on 07/19/2007 8:50:57 AM PDT by newbeenew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: billbears

How could Churchill be the one who laid the groundwork for the welfare state when they booted him out of office right after the war?


18 posted on 07/19/2007 9:24:18 AM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: newbeenew

Duh, how dumb of me to not remember that was Dave.

That was his one song that could rival anything Ray ever wrote.


19 posted on 07/19/2007 9:26:39 AM PDT by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Still Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson