Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Group Reports 1996 Immigration Law Separated 1.6 Million from Families (Major sob story alert)
Associated Press via Fox News ^ | Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Posted on 07/18/2007 11:39:22 PM PDT by Daralundy

WASHINGTON — An estimated 1.6 million children and spouses have been separated from family members forced to leave the country under toughened 1996 immigration laws, a human rights group said Wednesday.

The separations have taken a toll on families who have sold homes, lost jobs, lost businesses or been thrown into financial turmoil, Human Rights Watch said in a new report.

The widespread impact on American families has been truly devastating, said Alison Parker, a senior researcher with Human Rights Watch.

In 1996, Congress toughened immigration laws making immigrants, legal and illegal, deportable according to an expanded list of "aggravated felonies."

Congress made the law retroactive even to those who had served their sentences, and also eliminated hearings in which judges could consider an immigrant's family, community roots, military service or possible persecution in his or her native country.

Since this law was passed, 672,593 immigrants have been deported for crimes, according to statistics cited in the report from Citizenship and Immigration Services, a division of the Homeland Security Department. Human Rights Watch used those numbers and Census data on foreign-born households to estimate how many family members were left behind in the U.S.

Opposition to Senate Immigration Bill Republicans Upset Over Video on How to Hire Cheap Immigrant Labor Immigration Reform Could Be Key to Influential Latino Vote in 2008 According to statistics from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (or ICE), 64.6 percent of immigrants deported in 2005 had been convicted of nonviolent offenses. An additional 20.9 percent were deported for crimes involving violence against people, and 14.7 percent were deported for "other" crimes.

"How do you explain to a child that her father has been sent thousands of miles away and can never come home simply because he forged a check?" Parker said.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; immigrantlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: twonie

It was an obtuse reference to ‘Brother Where Art Thou’.


21 posted on 07/19/2007 8:23:42 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..

ping


22 posted on 07/19/2007 9:22:07 AM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy
Fortunately for me, nothing that Human Rights Watch thinks or say means squat.

Why is this "News"?
Every "separated" illegal has the option to follow their illegal family back home.
Any "separation" is self-imposed.

23 posted on 07/19/2007 9:36:14 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster

I hate to admit that I’m not wimpering or sniffling. The only place I can locate sympathy for these folks is in the dictionary.


24 posted on 07/19/2007 9:50:09 AM PDT by B4Ranch ( "Freedom is not free, but the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Niteflyr
"How do you explain to a child that her father has been sent thousands of miles away and can never come home simply because he forged a check?"

You don't.
You just forge another check, buy a coupla tickets and go join him!

Just saying.

25 posted on 07/19/2007 9:53:17 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rpgdfmx
The article focused on illegals and deportees, but this is a bigger problem then people realize. Despite what you’ve seen in the movies, marriage (or being engaged to) a U.S. citizen doesn’t give you an automatic right to stay in the country, and the bureaucracy — even for those playing by the rules — is byzantine and moves at a snail’s pace.

Total BS!
It may be today but from first hand experience I know this was not the case just a very few years ago, before the illegal flood became too large to ignore.
Any negative changes to the system in the last 5 years Has been the direct result of the massive abuse of the system by the illegals themselves.

Just saying.

26 posted on 07/19/2007 9:57:57 AM PDT by Publius6961 (MSM: Israelis are killed by rockets; Lebanese are killed by Israelis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy

DAMN!....
Where’s my violin?? :)


27 posted on 07/19/2007 10:01:20 AM PDT by gimme1ibertee (If not Fred, who?....If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy

Another 10.4 million to go?


28 posted on 07/19/2007 10:07:15 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daralundy

No, choosing to break the law separated those families.


29 posted on 07/19/2007 10:39:51 AM PDT by LexBaird (PR releases are the Chinese dog food of political square meals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rpgdfmx
The article focused on illegals and deportees, but this is a bigger problem then people realize. Despite what you’ve seen in the movies, marriage (or being engaged to) a U.S. citizen doesn’t give you an automatic right to stay in the country, and the bureaucracy — even for those playing by the rules — is byzantine and moves at a snail’s pace.

Because the article was about those deported for aggravated felonies. Those convicted of such are not "playing by the rules". The people you give as examples are not committing felonies, are they?

30 posted on 07/19/2007 10:44:32 AM PDT by LexBaird (PR releases are the Chinese dog food of political square meals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
NO! Criminal aliens who deserve to be deported.

There problem with the 1996 law and who is considered convicted. Someone may commit a misdemeanor, but, depending on the crime, the 1996 law can interpret that misdemeanor as an aggravated felony. Secondly, a foreigner may be arrested and charged, but then the charges are dropped or the case is dismissed can still be considered convicted by immigration. All it takes is a vindictive spouse to claim domestic violence and unless the alleged perpetrator is acquitted, the foreigner is at risk for deportation.

In other words, somone who is convicted in criminal court can still be found to be convicted by immigration. That is an example of a broken immigration law.

31 posted on 07/20/2007 6:44:19 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LexBaird
Because the article was about those deported for aggravated felonies. Those convicted of such are not "playing by the rules". The people you give as examples are not committing felonies, are they?

See my previous post. What the states and the feds don't consider as aggravated felonies, the 1996 immigration laws may be considered aggravated felonies by the immigration system. I you got 1 year and 1 day probation for a misdemeanor, you have committed an aggravated felony in the eyes of immigration.

32 posted on 07/20/2007 6:48:34 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: doc30

I you = If you


33 posted on 07/20/2007 6:49:10 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what an Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: doc30
If you got 1 year and 1 day probation for a misdemeanor, you have committed an aggravated felony in the eyes of immigration.

Examples of misdemeanors carrying that penalty? Are you talking of things such as DWI? If that is the type of misdemeanor you are talking of, I won't weep for their deportation.

Immigrating here is a privilege. If you can't keep clear of lawbreaking long enough to earn it, I don't particularly want you here. If that means you need to choose to leave your family behind or bring them back with you, tough; you should have thought about that before engaging in illegal behavior.

34 posted on 07/20/2007 2:15:53 PM PDT by LexBaird (PR releases are the Chinese dog food of political square meals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson