Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fester Chugabrew
Well, then, it seems to me it was a completely pointless excercise to make mention of them and authorize them in our founding documents.

Not at all. In 1789 various nations recognized letters of marque and reprisal.

They were used in an attempt to stop Muslim terrorist pirates from attacking our shipping in the Mediterranean and the African Coast (the Barbary Wars).

However, they were not very effective and the Marines had to be called in to stop the piracy (hence: "From the halls of Montezuma/ to the shores of Tripoli").

It wasn't until the Declaration of Paris in 1856 that all the European powers stopped recognizing letters of marque and reprisal.

From that point on, no nation has honored another nation's letters of marque and reprisal, and such letters are now utterly useless.

108 posted on 07/18/2007 1:34:23 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: wideawake

Again, letters of marqure are not for the purpose of gaining the legal respect of other countries, but to authorize one’s own citizens privately to undertake the forceful reclamation of property.


111 posted on 07/18/2007 1:36:28 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson