Skip to comments.
Study: Americans Don't Understand Others (why don't we all just die)
Live Science via Yahoo ^
| 7-18-07
| Corey Binns
Posted on 07/18/2007 8:05:10 AM PDT by Bladerunnuh
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
I am so sick of the daily assault on our nation and our intelligence. Yes, the Chinese are paragons of virtue and won't steal your corneas while you sleep. Yes.
To: Bladerunnuh
To: Bladerunnuh
They should quiz me on a multitude of things.
3
posted on
07/18/2007 8:07:46 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(Freedom is the right of all sentient beings - Peter Cullen as Optimus Prime)
To: Bladerunnuh
Pee on ~understanding~ others. Build the damn fence!
To: Bladerunnuh
Oh my god, what a steaming pile. It could sustain a colony of dung beetles for years!
To: Bladerunnuh
Does the understanding of the Chinese come before they bury people alive, harvest organs from living donors, use slave labor to make dangerous products...etc.
6
posted on
07/18/2007 8:10:44 AM PDT
by
nyconse
To: Bladerunnuh
Sorry but I don’t understand the “collectivist” point of view. Effort and success should be compensated.
The point of view I do not understand is why people come here with ideas other than becoming part of this culture and assimilating as such. And why we need to be forced to tolerate those who would alter our culture to fit a “collectivist” or “multicultural” environment.
What made America great is not the adaptation of our society to fit all those who would be a part of it, but rather the folks who come here becoming Americans in every sense of the word.
7
posted on
07/18/2007 8:12:04 AM PDT
by
AbeKrieger
(1) Border security first. 2) Repeat until #1 complete, then resume discussion.)
To: Bladerunnuh
“collectivist” society.” = communist
The have and have not.
Slavery
collectivist are failures
If China is so great, why are they all coming here?
8
posted on
07/18/2007 8:12:06 AM PDT
by
edcoil
(Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
To: Bladerunnuh
Beat me by five minutes on the post. :-)
This article is a stunning display of stupidity and propaganda.
To: Bladerunnuh
A more rational explanation is that the Americans chosen were so “wimpified” that they did not want to volunteer to move the block. The Orientals heard an order and were conditioned to obey.
10
posted on
07/18/2007 8:12:49 AM PDT
by
Ingtar
(The LDS problem that Romney is facing is not his religion, but his Lacking Decisive Stands.)
To: Bladerunnuh
Based on the nature of the experiment, I would say that the Americans made a more logical response to the situation. When asked to move a block, they asked which of the two blocks to move, rather than assuming which one was intended. The methodology of this experiment is completely unsound because the experimentors make inferences that aren't necessarily supported by the facts.
It's completely arbitrary for the experimentors to describe this as "egocentric" behavior; it is no such thing - how can asking the "director" which block is intended be "egocentric"? It is in fact interpersonal.
11
posted on
07/18/2007 8:15:52 AM PDT
by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: Bladerunnuh
As an American, I would tell the director to move his own damn block and then shoot him. /s
12
posted on
07/18/2007 8:17:21 AM PDT
by
Kirkwood
To: nyconse
Don’t forget: abort ever other baby.
13
posted on
07/18/2007 8:20:02 AM PDT
by
RobbyS
( CHIRHO)
To: Steve_Seattle
Exactly. It's just more propaganda, and I'm sick of it.
To: RobbyS
Yes, we should try to understand those...who have no respect for life and in general are barbarians.
15
posted on
07/18/2007 8:22:19 AM PDT
by
nyconse
To: Kirkwood
As an American, I would tell the director to move his own damn block and then shoot him. /s **************
LOL!!
Me, too. :)
16
posted on
07/18/2007 8:22:21 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Bladerunnuh
That’s because our range of thinking is much larger than the general chinese’s. Their collectivist society has destroyed their individual thoughts. Therefore it is easier for them to understand other people in their society, whereas we have been allowed to think freely and individually for so long that our range is much bigger. Resulting in making it a bit more difficult to comprehend all of the other folks thinking....
17
posted on
07/18/2007 8:23:12 AM PDT
by
CSM
("The rioting arsonists are the same folks who scream about global warming." LibFreeOrDie 5/7/07)
To: Bladerunnuh
So collectivism is good, and individualism is bad. And fair is foul and foul is fair.
18
posted on
07/18/2007 8:23:41 AM PDT
by
LIConFem
(Thompson 2008. Lifetime ACU Rating: 86 -- Hunter 2008 (VP) Lifetime ACU Rating: 92)
To: Bladerunnuh
Yeah...it interferes with the multi-national corporations ideas of what’s good for all of us..including ditching the Constitution.....
19
posted on
07/18/2007 8:23:43 AM PDT
by
mo
To: Bladerunnuh
Rugged American individualism could hinder our ability to understand other peoples' point of view, a new study suggests.Americanism is the best worldview. The point of view of others suck.They need to try to understand ours.
20
posted on
07/18/2007 8:24:24 AM PDT
by
mjp
(Live & let live. I don't want to live in Mexico, Marxico, or Muslimico. Statism & high taxes suck.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson