Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem
I can't imagine that this will be very healthy or hygienic for women in the long run. I can see missing 1 or 2 cycles, but to do so consistently or for far longer time frames? I can imagine a whole slew of health issues arising from tissues that need to be purged not naturally being removed. I won't speculate about cysts that nearly every woman I know either experienced or knows someone who deals with them. I don't imagine this will have a good impact towards that end either.

I'm not a gynecologist and I didn't stay in a holiday inn express last night.

It's just that artificially prolonging the duration of this natural cycle by a chemical imbalance seems to draw obvious questions and concerns. I mean, even in my exceptional caffeine deprived state...

Despite the articles implications that "sans menstrual cycle" a woman will be the same as a man in a position of responsibility, a woman is still a woman.

Chemically altering her so she can be more competitive? Beastly...

However, for women who suffer tremendously due to severe menstrual discomfort and perhaps other concerns, this pill could be a miracle.

From the perspective of healing, I welcome reasonable exploration of this as a resolution.

From the perspective of "Let's give this to Cheryle in accounting so she won't go PMS on us!"? Just d@mn...

4 posted on 07/18/2007 2:04:22 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Caipirabob

I had a hysterectomy and it cleared all of this up.

But could you check into this...I know the drug reps have to be beating down your door (they were when ran one)

The commercial says, four periods a year with breakthrough spotting, which can be a normal flow.

Isn’t this all just hype?


7 posted on 07/18/2007 3:49:42 AM PDT by netmilsmom (To attack one section of Christianity in this day and age, is to waste time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Caipirabob
It's just that artificially prolonging the duration of this natural cycle by a chemical imbalance seems to draw obvious questions and concerns.

First, Depo-Provera often did the same thing and started being used nearly thirty years ago. It has fallen into disfavor, partly because of calcium losses.

Secondly, chemical imbalances are not important with respect to phamaceutical Stock Prices, and as proof, consider the new norms of serum cholesterol being reduced to 100 mg/DL.

EVERYONE needs statins! We need to turn off certain metabolic pathways common to all mammals that only took a half-billion years to develop, to save the investors.

< sarc >Besides, the candidates for menstrual suppression are only women. They are imagining the side effects anyway, and not a lot of them are the biggest stockholders.< /sarc >

The runaway success of The Drug Answer seems to be related to hospital adminstrators double-booking physicians, and pressuring them to prescribe-and-dump, in order to get the same thoughput as a McDonald's burger stand.

This makes the MBA's, who for some reason, are attracted to the Practice of Medicine as a hobby, very happy.

8 posted on 07/18/2007 4:20:17 AM PDT by Gorzaloon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Caipirabob

Another guy chimes in. Got a clue why women have periods, besides to make their lives as miserable as possible for a few days a month? Women do not need to bleed to be happy and healthy.


15 posted on 07/18/2007 6:50:03 AM PDT by toomuchcoffee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Caipirabob
Chemically altering her so she can be more competitive? Beastly...

You mean like this?


51 posted on 07/19/2007 4:06:42 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson