Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hamilton worries about prospects in Iraq
AP on Yahoo ^ | 7/16/07 | Calvin Woodward - ap

Posted on 07/16/2007 1:24:01 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

WASHINGTON - Former Rep. Lee Hamilton, co-chairman of the Iraq Study Group, said Monday he's "extremely doubtful" that Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki will be able to secure the country and allow American forces to leave any time soon. President Bush, however, reaffirmed his strong support for al-Maliki.

And in what has become a drumbeat from the region, yet another military commander said Monday it would be a mistake to draw down U.S. troops just as the buildup is making its best progress.

"There is no chance that the Iraqi forces could take over at any time, or certainly by the first of the year," Hamilton said in a nationally broadcast interview. "All of the support efforts, logistical and medical and so forth, they are not close to being able to meet," Hamilton said.

British Army Lt. Gen. Graeme Lamb, deputy commander of international forces in Iraq, said that Iraqis also have a way to go to cleanse a police force infiltrated by Shiite militiamen. Officials have removed some 11,000 police suspected of sectarian bias, Lamb told Pentagon reporters, but he added that the problem won't be "solved overnight."

Meanwhile, President Bush talked to al-Maliki and other Iraqi officials in a secure video conference that lasted one hour, 12 minutes, said White House spokesman Tony Snow. The conference began with a one-on-one between Bush and al-Maliki, Snow said.

Bush made it clear to al-Maliki that continued U.S. support depends on political progress in Iraq, Snow said. "He encouraged efforts to build a strong unity coalition and to pass key legislation," Snow said.

Still, Snow said, "The president reaffirmed his strong support for Prime Minister Maliki."

Speaking earlier in an interview on NBC's "Today Show," Hamilton said al-Maliki's government also has made little progress on needed legislation and other efforts at reconciliation.

"He's had quite a bit of time now," Hamilton said. "He's known exactly what he's had to do. He hasn't done it. His rhetoric is pretty good. His performance is pretty bad."

The former Democratic congressman from Indiana, long a major player in foreign affairs issues, was interviewed on the same day that al-Maliki told NBC News in an interview that he now believes Iraqi forces will be ready to secure the country on their own by the end of the year.

Speaking through a translator, al-Maliki said, "As soon as we reach this level of readiness, the door will be open for dialogue between us and Americans about our future plans. Now we are thinking as politicians about how to maintain robust long-term relations with the Americans whether they remain on Iraqi soil or pull out from Iraq."

Hamilton's comments also came at a time when, at home in the United States unity within the Republican Party on Iraq is frayed, although holding up so far. But more pressure is being applied in this area as lawmakers from both the Republican and Democratic parties float proposals in the Senate to get U.S. troops out of Iraq soon.

Lamb said that would be a mistake.

Troops are making "good progress, steady momentum" with the course set in January to escalate the number of troops and step up operations in Baghdad and surrounding militant strongholds.

"I sense we're on a fair course right now ... it would be a shame to change it," Lamb said.

Democrats will try again this week to set a deadline for the reduction of U.S. forces in Iraq.

On the GOP side, two moderate Republicans with respected foreign policy credentials have proposed their own hurry-up initiative, winning a polite but clear rejection from the White House.

President Bush's national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, said "No" when asked Sunday whether Bush could live with the proposal by Sens. John Warner of Virginia and Richard Lugar of Indiana.

He said the administration's "very orderly process" for reviewing its Iraq plans, keyed on a mid-September appraisal of progress, should be allowed to play out without preconditions.

"They've done a useful service in indicating the kinds of things that we should be thinking about," Hadley said of the senators. "But the time to begin that process is September."

The Senate's Democratic leadership also is cool to the Warner-Lugar proposal, but for different reasons. Democrats favor tougher steps to restrict Bush's options, but need more Republicans to peel away from Bush before they can prevail.

___

Associated Press Writer Pauline Jelinek contributed to this story.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: hamilton; iraq; maliki; prospects; worries

1 posted on 07/16/2007 1:24:03 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

President Bush’s stand is really getting under these libs thin skin. They’ll either self destruct before or after the elections but they will self destruct. They are getting to a point of begging President Bush to claim defeat and pull troops because if they take over they will have to deal with it and either admit they are liars about pulling the troops or proclaim defeat which will be on their heads.


2 posted on 07/16/2007 1:37:58 PM PDT by tobyhill (only wimps believe in retreat in defeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Jeopardy answer: “One of America’s top traitors, he is also one of the country’s leading droolers”

Correct Jeopardy question: “Who is Lee Hamilton?”


3 posted on 07/16/2007 1:45:35 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

To that self-important former Indiana Congressional hack I say tell it to the oh so serious Charlie Rose.


4 posted on 07/16/2007 1:50:45 PM PDT by TheLawyerFormerlyKnownAsAl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Lee Hamilton — Ace Pessimist.


5 posted on 07/16/2007 1:53:24 PM PDT by syriacus (If the US troops had remained in S. Korea in 1949, there would have been no Korean War (1950-53).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
Your wrong. The Democrats polls are lower than Bush’s. A lot of them were elected to end the war. There trying to do that. I don’t agree with there bailing out and leaving Iraq high and dry but I also don’t buy into Bush’s fantasy of a stable Democratic Iraq. He’s out of touch big time. Just read some opinions of military experts. Unless the Iraq people take responsibility to govern themselves in unity, there’s nothing anybody can do to help them. Also the results of the war will be on George Bush’s head not so much congress.
6 posted on 07/16/2007 6:31:26 PM PDT by mustang buff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mustang buff
It looks like President Bush is real worried about it. /sarc
7 posted on 07/16/2007 6:38:19 PM PDT by tobyhill (only wimps believe in retreat in defeat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson