To: from occupied ga
> Remember this is the same court that handed down the Kelo decision Fair enough. But doesn't it seem unlikely that the same court would backtrack from an opinion rendered just a few months ago?
If one or more members had changed in the interim, I'd agree 100%. But I think rendering a different opinion -- with the same members and so soon after the previous ruling -- would simply make them look foolish, both in public and amongst themselves....
136 posted on
07/16/2007 1:02:59 PM PDT by
NewJerseyJoe
(Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
To: NewJerseyJoe
Fair enough. But doesn't it seem unlikely that the same court would backtrack from an opinion rendered just a few months ago?One would hope. Keeping fingers crossed
137 posted on
07/16/2007 1:19:09 PM PDT by
from occupied ga
(Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
To: NewJerseyJoe
Bookmark.
BTW, there ARE errors in the Parker decision.
138 posted on
07/16/2007 1:20:57 PM PDT by
patton
(19yrs ... only 4,981yrs to go ;))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson