Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TxCopper

I wonder if any of you goobers bothered to click the link and hear the audio. I did
The title of this thread is a complete lie.
What Ron Paul said was that there was a danger of a Gulf of Tonkin style provocation. He did not say there was a danger of a “staged terror attack”.


63 posted on 07/14/2007 10:33:25 AM PDT by Abcdefg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Abcdefg
What the hell do you think a ‘Gulf of Tonkin style provocation’ is?
66 posted on 07/14/2007 10:36:02 AM PDT by mnehring (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Abcdefg
What Ron Paul said was that there was a danger of a Gulf of Tonkin style provocation. He did not say there was a danger of a “staged terror attack”.

Your beloved Al-Queda member believes that a terror attack will be staged so the Bush administration unimpeded access to attack Iran, nuttie.

67 posted on 07/14/2007 10:36:29 AM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Abcdefg

Thanks for sticking your head out of your spider hole, so we can see how much sense you have.


72 posted on 07/14/2007 10:39:09 AM PDT by jrooney (The democrats are the friend of our enemy and the enemy of our friends. Attack them, not GW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Abcdefg
What Ron Paul said was that there was a danger of a Gulf of Tonkin style provocation.

Depending on your understanding of the GOT incident, it could mean the same thing precisely...goober.
75 posted on 07/14/2007 10:40:08 AM PDT by mutley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Abcdefg
The title of this thread is a complete lie. What Ron Paul said was that there was a danger of a Gulf of Tonkin style provocation. He did not say there was a danger of a “staged terror attack”.

Of course it is, and of course no one's ACTUALLY bother to listed to what Ron Paul has to say; they'd rather let the SPINMEISTERS tell them what he said and think for them, while they're at it.

165 posted on 07/14/2007 3:36:57 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

To: Abcdefg
Thread (up to 100 or so) appears to be a knee jerk reaction to inaccurate reports. I am undecided about Ron Paul’s qualifications to be President, but the ad hominem issuing forth here makes me wonder if he may be right. It is as if a bunch of little girls jumped in to call names before taking time to examine what he actually said and meant, and to what degree it may have any basis in reality.

Has the Gulf of Tonkin attack been fully understood by history? Having experienced Clinton types in power I have little faith in the Feds, and may reserve the word “nutcase” for those who look to them for every good. I appreciate Mr. Paul’s dedication to practicing our forefather’s desire for limited government and a strict reading of the Constitution.

379 posted on 07/15/2007 11:05:02 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson