Posted on 07/14/2007 9:48:41 AM PDT by TxCopper
Windmills indeed!!!!!
I’ve “spun it so badly” that the National Review Online took my own words and wrote an article repeating what I said.
FOFLMAO!
You may FIRST want to read the National Review Online article, which excoriatesIs that the one where the author still use accepts the term 'nutty' to be used in regards to L. Ron Paul:
Call Ron Paul nutty if you like -- and certainly this media appearance gives reasons for doing so (he almost predicts an economic collapse later in the interview).Ahhh - I see that it is.
ANd, to top it off, that orginal article/radio interview was conducted by none other than top conspira-torialist and whackjob 9-11 'truther' Alex Jones ...
You’re flailing.
This was a smear job, hit piece, nothing more.
That you are in denial about that fact is not evidence that anyone has a problem but you and your ilk who are into character assassinations based upon misrepresentations of what someone said.
It was pointed out to me much earlier that I’ve been tilting windmills in my attempts to have an intelligent dialogue with these RPbots. It’s good to see that I’m not alone in this.
So, in nicmarlo’s post 463 he’s admitting that the NRO article is a hit piece? This is what he wants to use to support his position? Wow!!
there you go, misrepresenting again. My, what talent you have.
LOL all you want Churchill did give the order and it is well documented. Any “Civilian” ship was to stand down and be inspected for contraband. Churchill gave specific orders to resist. The United States was secretly helping Britain and loaning it money prior to our entrance in the war, we we were supposed to have been a neutral nation.
There is a very interesting and well documented book you should read “The Creature From Jekyll Island” The Authors name is Griffin. He’s not perfect but he is pretty good.
Next thing you are going to tell me is the Civil war was really fought over slavery.
You and I both know that much of the history is written by the victors of war and is going to have their bias.
Way to shred your 0.04% of the vote there, Ron.
You're flailing.It is the truth.
The WHOLE ruckus is about an ALex Jones conducted interview with L. Ron Paul.
Not Michelle Malkin.
Not Walter E. Williams.
Not Ann Coulter.
Not Laura Ingrham..
ALEX JONES, a so-called self identifying '9-11 truther'.
Do you DENY this?
I don’t deny it, YOU’RE STILL FLAILING!!!
It was pointed out to me much earlier that I've been tilting windmills in my attempts to have an intelligent dialogue with these RPbots. It's good to see that I'm not alone in this.Every so often the fruit-loops come out in force over some new nirvana - or candidate - and when you 'mess' with their idyllic visionary savior - buddy, watch out!
But, it is cathartic. We'll weed out the weaker parties, they will go off and lick their wounds and 'grow' from the experience.
Meanwhile, it is sort of like passing a kidney stone ... very painful at times.
A quote to remember: NRO writer David Freddoso (who did not totally exonerate L. Ron Paul) wrote:
Call Ron Paul nutty if you like -- and certainly this media appearance gives reasons for doing so (he almost predicts an economic collapse later in the interview).PS. I have found that repetition works with some of these people; the sharper ones eventually figure all this out, the weaker, duller ones migrate to lesser, unmentionable web sites ...
SO, in effect, you deny it.
But I want to hear you say “I deny it”.
So say it.
(I don’t want to regard you as a lamer or anything ...)
And I want to “hear” you admit that you and your ilk, along with politico.com, have misrepresented what Ron Paul said in the interview......
but I’m not holding my breath.
Fruit-loops indeed. It’s not hard to figure out why they support RP. My catharticism is complete at this juncture. I feel that I’ve met one of those weaker duller ones, and have gone as far as is possible with him. I hope he obtains enlightenment, but I don’t expect it. The repetition of my posts fell on blind eyes obviously. He’s seriously decompensating and his perserveration on his one and only talking point is tedious. I fear that he may be trapped within his own mind with no escape. Pity.
Yup - I hear all that. At some point in their life they will ‘grow up’. Hopefully.
you all have been propping up politico.com, a known propaganda b.s. site.....
glad to see you have SOME “journalism” standards
FOFLOL!
Why do the networks continue to allow him to debate with serious GOP candidates?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.