Posted on 07/14/2007 6:27:48 AM PDT by RKV
For most high school students who want to attend an elite college, the SAT is more than a test. It is one of lifes landmarks. Waiting for the scoresone for verbal, one for math, and now one for writing, with a possible 800 on eachis painfully suspenseful. The exact scores are commonly remembered forever after.
...
The pivotal analysis was published in 2001 by the University of California (UC), which requires all applicants to take both the SAT and achievement tests (three of them at the time the data were gathered: reading, mathematics, and a third of the students choosing). Using a database of 77,893 students who applied to UC from 1996 to 1999, Saul Geiser and Roger Studley analyzed the relationship among high school grades, SAT scores, achievement test scores, and freshman grades in college. Here is what they found:
Achievement tests did slightly better than the SAT in predicting freshman grades. High school grade point average, SAT scores, and achievement test scores were entered into a statistical equation to predict the grade point that applicants achieved during their freshman year in college. The researchers found that achievement tests and high school grade point each had about the same independent rolethat is, each factor was, by itself, an equally accurate predictor of how a student will do as a college freshman.
But the SATs independent role in predicting freshman grade point turned out to be so small that knowing the SAT score added next to nothing to an admissions officers ability to forecast how an applicant will do in collegethe reason to give the test in the first place.
(Excerpt) Read more at american.com ...
One of the requirements to gain admission to one of our nations Military Academies, (West Point, Annapolis, Air Force Academy, Merchant Marine Academy) you have to submit three SAT scores over a period of two years. Each SAT score must be higher than the previous.
I’ve heard about the “probation” system where they don’t score well but other factors let them attend - so there’s a good method to let them enjoy the fruits of their labor.
My daughter has been doing the S.A.T. since kindergarten. Tests don’t bother her. She works hard and has no fear of tests.
BTW, what is the difference between the A.C.T. and the S.A.T.. Her school doesn’t have the kids take the A.C.T. - just the S.A.T.. It pays to use a spell checker ... .
“The educational establishment may actually have more to fear from” achievement tests. Yep. Either you get the calculus problem right or you don’t.
Horsehockey! The SAT scores were inflated in the mid -'90s to "correct" for the fact that minority students (except for Asians) were scoring so poorly.
So this guy thinks that somebody with an SAT Math score of 400 has a chance of doing well in an MIT engineering class?
Murray, in The Bell Curve pointed out the fallacy. Yes, among students above a cutoff threshold of SAT, grades and achievement tests (which measure a willingness to work hard) are more important predictors than raw SAT. This does not mean that SAT can be dismissed
Which is to say you must learn to take written tests. Nothing negative about our military academies, but I do wonder about the validity of that specific requirement (3 SATs with increasing results). Taking it once with a high score, ought to be enough to assess your academic ability don’t you think?
WRONG: He is a Libertarian.
You hit the nail on the head. Without SATs schools would be pressured to gives an A grade all the time. Heck, they already get a lot of pressure to do so now.
I have admired Murray's work in the past but, if you don't mind, I will take my queue from the largely successful strategy that the NRA has used in defending our Second Amendment rights: If I see a hair on the camel's nose brushing the bottom edge of the tent, I will attack it with fire, poison, machete and every other weapon in my arsenal.
I stand for no-bull$hit ~~testing~~ to hold both the educational establishment and students to measurable standards. The SAT may be superfluous, but keep your hands off any aspect of measuring results and upholding standards. In fact, I suggest that we introduce an additional test, of the same general sort, to build a bit more redundancy in the firewall against the complete collapse of standards.
I believe that there is no shortage of wasteful practices that might profitably be cut from the educational process. Why don't we just right now put out-of-bounds the "reform" of testing. Go reform something else.
The author of this article is the SAME Murray who wrote The Bell Curve.
You keep missing the point. The SAT I and the SAT II Subject Matter Tests are both objective tests. They equally correlate to college freshman grades. Murray’s point is that there is no point in taking both, and there are several reasons why between the two, the SAT II should be kept, and the SAT I should be abolished.
How about that? Someone who didn’t cram for HS tests ends up learning from the mistakes made on them, and remembers those facts forever.
How about that?
Anyone else remembers the Osteichythes classification?
from 9th grade?
Cram for the test and forget it by Finals. What a concept - real learning...
Does this make the case for more and stricter standardized national testing methodology?
Or returning the SAT to it’s pre 70s state?
Why was it changed to begin with? To more accurately relflect... what?
It failed at that? - Change it back.
...Did the pre-1994 SAT measure something importantly different from what the post-1994 SAT had measured? Dont bother asking the College Board. The data for answering that question would require the College Board to reveal just how well the original and revised SATs measure the general mental factor g, the stuff of intelligence/aptitude, and the College Board does not want to acknowledge that the SAT measures g at all or, for that matter, that g even exists..."
Colleges, parents, politicians et al may want to avoid measuring or talking about "g" but the real world will continue to measure it.
I think Murray wants to be appreciated by all rather than accept the hard facts of human nature. Abolishing the SAT will temporarily mean more minorities in the Ivy League but, eventually, truth will out and best and the brightest will survive and thrive and the others will do less well.
And it would seem to be unfair if someone were sick and performing below their best on the last test.
“You keep missing the point. The SAT I and the SAT II Subject Matter Tests are both objective tests. They equally correlate to college freshman grades. Murrays point is that there is no point in taking both, and there are several reasons why between the two, the SAT II should be kept, and the SAT I should be abolished.”
You may want to address this to RKV. He has a different take on this article.
It doesn’t matter to me if they take both or one.
Plenty of registered Republicans (like yours truly) have libertarian sentiments. Personally, if the Republican Party nominates McCain or Rudy I may have to vote Libertarian myself.
But what about the sophomore year? Junior? Will the student make it to graduation? What utility does the reasoning test have there? That is a very important question to ask and answer before abandoning the SAT I. I think graduation prediction is more important when the taxpayer is footing the bill.
Also, the study was California-centric, no? Perhaps there was not enough grade-inflation variation to draw nationwide conclusion. Then again, SAT II testing does deal directly with high school GPA validation, at least for the subject areas measured.
There is also the firestorm in Florida over the FCAT (Florida Comprehensive Achievement Test), with a concerted effort to drive a stake through it. Yes, the teachers test to it bus since it is standards-based and therefore the teachers are teaching to the standard, what is the problem? Not to go down that rat hole any further, but just consider that when you trash one standard test you run the risk of tipping over a string of dominoes.
Murray proposes other current objective measures rather than the SAT (e.g. SATII and AP). Basically, its a matter of using multiple tests to measure what is essentially the same thing. Why duplicate?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.