To: BGHater
9 posted on
07/13/2007 8:06:13 AM PDT by
Seruzawa
(Attila the Hun... wasn't he a liberal?)
To: Seruzawa
That’s the real point here. I don’t care how strong or weak the rape case is, when a judge starts controlling the vocabulary of the witnesses it is pretty evident that he is trying to control the outcome of the case. It’s like banning the words, “kill,” “murder,” “weapon” at a murder trial. It just doesn’t make sense. That is not a judge’s prerogative. Does he think the jury is incapable of detecting bs?
To: Seruzawa
Its a state law, and has little to do with being PC. Rape is a legal term, as is sexual assault. As a witness she is not qualified to render that decision, that what the jury is for. It would be like Darth Vader becoming his own light saber. Its a color word, a buzz word. Ive asked three women that I know who have been raped and they said it wasn’t rape, just naivety and/or stupidity with a helping of entitlement and ‘poor me’ thrown in.
67 posted on
07/13/2007 12:06:15 PM PDT by
alathea
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson