[goldstategop]

To force him to pay would be a monstrous injustice. He doesn't even have a relationship with the child and its acknowledged he's NOT the father. So he ought to owe NO child support whatsoever. Zip, zero, zilch, nada.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

[drb9]

I would bet that the mother is on welfare and picking up support for her child from the state of Flori-duh. Flori-duh is trying to recoup its loss by going after this guy. (I’m not saying it’s right. In fact, it really puts to the test the “rule of law” principle that we adhere to. The law says he got notice and that he missed the deadline for contesting paternity. Therefore the “law” says that he owes the money. Of course, this is exhibit A for changing the law in light of DNA testing that can affirmatively prove or disprove paternity.)

[Little Ray]

Wrong.
He’s apparently acknowledged the child as his for a long time. His responsibility doesn’t change just because of a divorce and a paternity test. He need to check to when the child was born.
And just think of what this is doing to the girl...