Wrong.
He’s apparently acknowledged the child as his for a long time. His responsibility doesn’t change just because of a divorce and a paternity test. He need to check to when the child was born.
And just think of what this is doing to the girl...
“And just think of what this is doing to the girl...”
How about what the mother did to the girl instead. The entire blame lies on her for the fraud she has perpetrated.
Everytime they run these articles, they always try to paint the one who was conned as this selfish guy who is punishing the kids. I can understand its an emotionally complicated thing. But how come its always, “the mother declined to be interviewed.......” We know exactly why she did. Because she’s a fraud and dragged her children into this as well. I’m sure if these men were not getting screwed over in courts, many more would be open to being friends with these children and being involved in their lives.
I have a best friend who has been involved in a very similar set of circumstances. Finding out after a few years of paying child support that the kid isn’t his and the mother picked him to claim he was the father because he made a decent living. Surprise, surprise, the courts are going after him, not the biological father to financially support this child.
How come we never hear of the courts going after the real fathers to pay the child support? Because the biased family courts aren’t interested in that. All they care about is finding some male who was dumb enough to work hard and make something of themselves to foot the bill for someone elses fraud and bad decisions.
Like many men, he had no reason to think that a fraud was being perpetrated upon him.
These days, DNA paternity tests should be performed automatically just like tests for AIDS or other diseases are performed when a woman has a baby. The fact that it is not, is proof that the state isn't interested in the truth of the situation, and that they just don't care about this type of fraud by women.
What the hell article are you reading? Because it's sure not this one.