Skip to comments.
Dog taken off voter rolls -- after three elections (Washington State. Of Course)
The Times of India ^
| July 12, 2007
Posted on 07/12/2007 1:19:09 AM PDT by Stoat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
I posted this version from The Times of India to illustrate the international interest in this story and also because most local press sources would have required extensive, heavy editing in order to be post-able at Free Republic.
Some other sources:
FOXNews.com - Dog Removed from Washington State Voter Rolls After 3 Elections - Politics Republican Party Democratic Party Political Spectrum
The removal came three weeks after Balogh was charged in King County Superior Court with making a false or misleading statement to a public servant, a misdemeanor. She pleaded not guilty to the charge in June.A sheriff's investigator wrote that she admitted registering the dog under false pretenses "to make a point that anyone could vote, even an animal."
A preliminary court hearing was pending.
Local News Dog taken off voter rolls Seattle Times Newspaper
Balogh has pleaded not guilty to a gross misdemeanor charge of making a false statement to a public official by signing a declaration in Duncan's name saying he was over 18 and a U.S. citizen.Her attorney, Kristen Anderson, said Balogh deserves a better deal than that offered to people who fraudulently cast more than one vote in an election.
Canine removed from voter rolls
1
posted on
07/12/2007 1:19:14 AM PDT
by
Stoat
To: All
2
posted on
07/12/2007 1:26:29 AM PDT
by
Stoat
(Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
To: Stoat
My dog has better sense that most of folks who vote down in Madison.
3
posted on
07/12/2007 2:22:22 AM PDT
by
elli1
To: Stoat
The dog must have been registered as a democrat, otherwise he would have been removed immediately.
4
posted on
07/12/2007 2:27:59 AM PDT
by
Fresh Wind
(Without the fence, deporting illegals is like shoveling water.)
To: Fresh Wind
Actually, he was registered as a Republican.
The owner pleaded guilty to making a false statement.
A news article about her trial was posted on FR a few weeks ago and I was dumbfounded by the number of FReepers who thouht what she did was OK.
5
posted on
07/12/2007 2:34:02 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(What happens if you're frightened half to death........................twice?)
To: HEY4QDEMS
I was dumbfounded by the number of FReepers who thouht what she did was OK.What she did was completely moral. It showed up a systemic problem with American vote registration. Moreover it was hilarious. So of course the humorless American state machine tried to crush her like a bug. And, I'm sorry to say, you appear to be ok with that.
To: Stoat
Today when I got blood work done I was required to tell them my name and date of birth inorder to make sure they didn't mix up the lab results.
Doing this at the polls would be a great way to end much of the voter fraud. But if you make up a name and info it pretty much renders the point moot.
7
posted on
07/12/2007 3:11:06 AM PDT
by
LukeL
(Never let the enemy pick the battle site. (Gen. George S. Patton))
To: agere_contra
So you are OK with Democrats, dogs, cats, goldfish, illegal aliens, etc filing fraudulent voter registrations so long as they’re only trying to prove a point.
After all, you just indicated that such an act is moral.
8
posted on
07/12/2007 3:15:15 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(What happens if you're frightened half to death........................twice?)
To: HEY4QDEMS
Actually, he was registered as a Republican. The owner pleaded guilty to making a false statement.Why, was the dog actually a Democrat?
9
posted on
07/12/2007 3:17:50 AM PDT
by
NurdlyPeon
(Thompson / Hunter in 2008)
To: agere_contra
So of course the humorless American state machine tried to crush her like a bug.
Voter fraud is a felony which could result in several years in prison, her charge was reduced to misdemeanor making a false statement for which she was fined and given a short probation.
Hardly what I would call crushing someone like a bug.
10
posted on
07/12/2007 3:19:43 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(What happens if you're frightened half to death........................twice?)
To: NurdlyPeon
Why, was the dog actually a Democrat?
Hell no!, dogs are too smart to be Rats.
11
posted on
07/12/2007 3:22:13 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(What happens if you're frightened half to death........................twice?)
To: LukeL
You may also recall that the election of present governor of Washington State (a Democrat) was very close and turned on late arriving absentee ballots cast primarily in King County (the location of very liberal Seattle). IIRC, a post-election investigation revealed a lot of phony registrations for absentee ballots. Using absentee ballots to perpetuate this type of fraud is much easier as no one has to ever show up anywhere in the process from registration to voting.
Whenever confronted with situations like this, election officials (inevitably Democrat) usually justify their reluctance in removing someone from the rolls to not wanting to deprive anyone of their right to vote. Personally, I think it would be kind of handy for a political party to have several thousand “guaranteed” votes in its pocket. Of course, you wouldn’t use such a tool unless a critical race or ballot initiative turned out to be particularly tight. And it helps if you control the election management process as well. Sure, you EVENTUALLY will purge the rolls of the dogs, children, illegal immigrants, felons, and imaginary people. That way, you can say you are doing due diligence in performing your duties. But not before you get a couple of elections worth of use out of them. And if some OUTSIDER, like this woman, comes along and embarrasses you, you just charge her with making a false statement to a public official and have your co-conspriator...err, the King County prosecutor ... take her to court.
I wonder what did happened in the King county case? Seems it just ... went away. How odd. Not!!
12
posted on
07/12/2007 4:07:50 AM PDT
by
Captain Rhino
( Dollars spent in India help a friend; dollars spent in China arm an enemy.)
To: HEY4QDEMS
Not quite.
The county prosecutor's office offered to charge Balogh only with a misdemeanor and to agree to a sentencing recommendation of a one-year deferred sentence, a year of probation, 10 hours of community service and a $250 fine if she pleads guilty. If she doesn't, the prosecutor's office will charge her with a felony.
Guess we will find out today what happened in court yesterday. I got the impression from the articles that she and her attorney were going to plead not guilty.
13
posted on
07/12/2007 4:15:43 AM PDT
by
Captain Rhino
( Dollars spent in India help a friend; dollars spent in China arm an enemy.)
To: Captain Rhino
14
posted on
07/12/2007 4:18:21 AM PDT
by
Captain Rhino
( Dollars spent in India help a friend; dollars spent in China arm an enemy.)
To: HEY4QDEMS
Actually, he was registered as a Republican. The owner pleaded guilty to making a false statement. That makes sense. The owner was doing a protest. All the dogs that are registered Democrats are still voting.
15
posted on
07/12/2007 4:23:04 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
To: Captain Rhino
I got the impression from the articles that she and her attorney were going to plead not guilty.
The article that I read quoted her as saying that she knows she broke the law and intended to plead guilty.
16
posted on
07/12/2007 4:24:47 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(What happens if you're frightened half to death........................twice?)
To: Captain Rhino
17
posted on
07/12/2007 4:36:07 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(What happens if you're frightened half to death........................twice?)
To: HEY4QDEMS
Voter fraud is a felony which could result in several years in prison, her charge was reduced to misdemeanor making a false statement for which she was fined and given a short probation. The point is that the dog just registered but didn't vote. No harm was done to the political process in making her point.
Contrast this with all the fraudulent votes that are cast every year in King County by people who are registered under three and four different names --- but they go after the dogs owner instead of the real criminals. Wooof !!!
18
posted on
07/12/2007 4:37:52 AM PDT
by
Uncle Chip
(TRUTH : Ignore it. Deride it. Allegorize it. Interpret it. But you can't ESCAPE it.)
To: Stoat
How do we get the dogs off of the Ballots?????
Let’s work the important issues!!!!!
19
posted on
07/12/2007 4:48:15 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
To: All
the owner really takes Yellow Dog democrat seriously.
In the late 19th century and throughout the 20th century, yellow dog Democrats were voters in the U.S. Southern states who consistently voted for Democratic candidates because of lingering resentment against Republicans from the Civil War and Reconstruction periods. The term arose from the notion that a Southerner would vote for a yellow dog before voting for a Republican
20
posted on
07/12/2007 5:29:25 AM PDT
by
TheShadows
(GOP & RNC NOT A DIME NOT A VOTE! (illegal lovers!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson