Doing this at the polls would be a great way to end much of the voter fraud. But if you make up a name and info it pretty much renders the point moot.
Whenever confronted with situations like this, election officials (inevitably Democrat) usually justify their reluctance in removing someone from the rolls to not wanting to deprive anyone of their right to vote. Personally, I think it would be kind of handy for a political party to have several thousand “guaranteed” votes in its pocket. Of course, you wouldn’t use such a tool unless a critical race or ballot initiative turned out to be particularly tight. And it helps if you control the election management process as well. Sure, you EVENTUALLY will purge the rolls of the dogs, children, illegal immigrants, felons, and imaginary people. That way, you can say you are doing due diligence in performing your duties. But not before you get a couple of elections worth of use out of them. And if some OUTSIDER, like this woman, comes along and embarrasses you, you just charge her with making a false statement to a public official and have your co-conspriator...err, the King County prosecutor ... take her to court.
I wonder what did happened in the King county case? Seems it just ... went away. How odd. Not!!
“Doing this at the polls would be a great way to end much of the voter fraud. But if you make up a name and info it pretty much renders the point moot.”
It’s moot because it doesn’t stop the GOVERNMENT types from stuffing the boxes with the votes of illegals and corpses.