Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don't Be So Sure There Were No WMD in Iraq [ExileStreet]
ExileStreet ^ | 7/11/07 | Rachel Neuwirth

Posted on 07/11/2007 6:12:47 AM PDT by ParsifalCA

Before America went to war to topple Saddam Hussein's regime it was widely believed that he possessed weapons of mass destruction. Today it is widely believed that there were no WMD in Iraq before the war. People of both political parties, the major media, and the intellectual community all appear in strong agreement on that point. Some even charge that the Bush Administration deliberately, and knowingly, misled the nation with false information as a pretext to justify going to war.

The Bush Administration is quietly acknowledging that they made a mistake, albeit not intentional. That admission seems to be the final confirmation that there were no WMD in Iraq. In police work when the accused confesses to making a mistake, it is then assumed that the accusation is true and people consider it to be ‘case closed'.

This widespread belief of no WMD in Iraq is seriously damaging our ability to deal with a growing nuclear threat from Iran. There are those who opposed our toppling mass murderer Saddam Hussein both in 1991 and again in 2003, even after he defied multiple U.N. resolutions and was generally believed to have WMD. Now the ‘peace at any price' crowd is exploiting the widespread belief of ‘no WMD' to undermine our war in Iraq. If we fail in Iraq it greatly weakens our ability to deal with Iran, which will become greatly emboldened and infinitely more dangerous as it eventually goes nuclear. [more]

(Excerpt) Read more at exilestreet.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: ncpatriot

Most likely because they don’t believe in countries and have not for quite some time (at least since ‘88, and then I’m not too sure that Reagan wasn’t the only one in his administration that was an “American”).


41 posted on 07/11/2007 2:09:36 PM PDT by David Isaac (Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ParsifalCA

bfl


42 posted on 07/11/2007 4:56:53 PM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: David Isaac

I just heard on talk radio today that “leaders” worldwide are wanting to do away with borders so that countries have no sovereignty. Is this what you are talking about? It has something to do with free trade.


43 posted on 07/11/2007 5:24:49 PM PDT by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ncpatriot

I would say it had a lot more to do with one-world government. This free-trade thing is being abused to grease the skids.


44 posted on 07/11/2007 5:32:22 PM PDT by David Isaac (Duncan Hunter '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson