Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: agere_contra
Lockwood & Fröhlich don’t consider the effect of the vast ocean heat sink on temperature variations.

Sure...and Einstein was wrong because he made a simple arithmetic error. Give it a rest.

53 posted on 07/11/2007 4:24:15 AM PDT by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: liberallarry

Son of MurryMom?


58 posted on 07/11/2007 4:29:06 AM PDT by drlevy88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: liberallarry
A lot of people seem to believe a news article that says "a real smart guy says man made CO2 is warming the earth and the sun isn't".    Second hand info sucks.  We live in an age were we can get our own numbers, confirm them by taking our own measurements, and then do our own analysis.   It's not all that hard.


75 posted on 07/11/2007 4:42:05 AM PDT by expat_panama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: liberallarry
Sure...and Einstein was wrong because he made a simple arithmetic error. Give it a rest.

I can't work out what you're talking about. Is it your contention that solar insolation ISN'T the primary factor in global temperature?

In which case its time to EAT SOME GRAPHS!!! :0)

The following is a collection of temperature reconstructions. Note the sinusoidal variations in temperature over the last 1000 years. Note the high temperatures 1000 years ago. Perhaps the Guardian can explain how those evil Greenlanders managed to drive temperatures so high in 1000 AD. And why temperatures got so low in the 1600's?


79 posted on 07/11/2007 4:44:15 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson