Whoa, let's get clear on what's going on here. If we were working with a scientific problem, then who ever made the assertion would have to back it up with supporting observations. The assertion here is that manmade CO2 is heating the earth. No data were offered. The issue should have died there because all that matters here is whether the article's thesis is based on observation. My credentials are not relevant, neither are the numbers I offered showing the correlations between temps and solar activity being higher than with CO2. The burden of proof falls on the claimant.
The bottom line here is that this issue is not based in science, it's a political issue. We're arguing about it on this political forum because the loony liberal tax raisers are using this global warming hoax to raise taxes. You haven't convinced me to vote for higher taxes.
Not on this thread.
The assertion is that global warming in the last 20 years is not due to changes in solar activity. The supporting evidence is presented in the paper published in the proceedings of the Royal Society.