Not on this thread.
The assertion is that global warming in the last 20 years is not due to changes in solar activity. The supporting evidence is presented in the paper published in the proceedings of the Royal Society.
The article said that the "new analysis is designed to counter the main alternative scientific argument put forward by the programme - that solar activity may be to blame for global warming." This is political; we get the assertion first and then we get data to back up the assertion. In science we look at the data first and then we look where the data points.
The supporting evidence is presented in the paper
That was the impression that I'd gotten too, but apparently it's neither been published nor been through the peer review. All the links to date refer to a study that is "to be published". Please let me know when it's available so you and I can review it together.