Posted on 07/10/2007 2:15:19 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Sunday's New York Times contains an article about the 2008 race that poses a different question than most other commentary thus far. It's not asking if America's ready for a woman president, or a Mormon, or an African-American. It's asking whether America's ready for a trophy wife.
The wife in question is Jeri Kehn Thompson, 40, who's married to Fred Thompson, the 64-year-old former "Law and Order" actor and Republican senator from Tennessee who's expected to announce a bid for the presidency. The Times describes her as having "youthfulness, [a] permanent tan and bleached blonde hair" and asks whether "so-called values voters" -- i.e., conservative Republicans -- would "accept this union."
This probably won't come as surprising to Kehn Thompson, whose age and appearance have earned her Internet abuse and a comment by Joe Scarborough asking if she "works the pole," during a segment about striptease workouts. But that doesn't mean it's excusable. (And as the Times put it, "It is hard to imagine a man, however handsome, suffering similar insult.")
Here are my questions: Why should the couple's age difference be blamed on the woman? (Fred was presumably a big part of that decision, too.) What does the appearance of a first lady have to do with her husband's bid for the presidency (or vice versa)? And, as always, why should a woman need to defend herself against accusations that she's a "bimbo" just because she's attractive? Even the Times plays into this, pointing out that Kehn Thompson is a former Senate aide and a spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee -- as if her blondeness needs to be offset by professional accomplishment. And, continues the Times, "she is not a homewrecker." Thanks. What, exactly, does that have to do with her husband's run for president? Even if their marriage had been preceded by an extramarital affair, why should Mrs. Thompson be the one on the defensive? Wouldn't that reflect just as poorly -- if not more so -- on her husband?
What's more, it seems as if people's obsession with Kehn Thompson has less to do with her objective age or attractiveness than the fact that she's with an older man. After all, Michelle Obama is a vibrant 43 -- not too far past Kehn Thompson, and an attractive person to boot. And yet no one's asking whether Michelle's too hot for the White House (perhaps those people are too busy asking whether she's too black for the White House). Yes, a 24-year age difference does turn heads, and yes, any candidate with a "trophy" spouse is going to attract attention. But why must the attention always focus on the woman?
The Times' headline was "Will Her Face Determine His Fortune." Let's hope that if push comes to shove, it's actually his capabilities, not his wife's appearance, that determine whether Thompson's fit for office.
It's ok just to screw with interns half your age, but marriage? Much too 'traditional' for the Left.
So, what's the problem? Why should it be 'blamed' on anyone?
So, actually, she is young enough to be his daughter.
She's 40!!! The way people are writing about this, you'd think Thompson was some kind of creep trolling college campuses fer cryin' out loud.
I wondered how I would respond. I think I'd say something like, "Yes, she is a prize, and I feel like a winner for marrying her."
Honestly, I think the first wife is hotter!
To their credit, Fred and Jeri have not featured their children in this not-yet-a-campaign, but after he gets the nomination, I would expect stories and photos of Jeri and the kids to be out there. It's an endearing image, and there have not been tykes in the White House since the days of Camelot. Many baby-boomer voters who remember that time as being friendly to their generation will admire Fred and Jeri for their parenthood, and will look kindly on the idea of seeing Fred's kids crawl under his desk in the Oval Office.
Compared to the alternative of a Presidential child who is an adult woman resembling Webster Hubbell, it's an unfair fight!
You’re just fine, and I agree ~
Mitt or Rudy won’t beat Hillary.
That’s why she’s trying to pillory
her nemesis’ ~ Fred’s family.
Actually it’s only partially positive. It doesn’t say that Jeri’s NOT a trophy wife, it only says why should the blame always be put on the WOMAN, and not the man in question. Though I do have to say that the derisive comment about the folks who are complaining about Jeri being too young and pretty, would probably also have a problem with Michelle Obama being too black, is just priceless.
shudder
Her looks are being really overstated by people on both sides of the political aisle. She is a naturally attractive woman, but no more. She doesn’t have the youth or looks of a classic trophy wife at all.
On the 1 to 10 scale I’d say she is about a 6+, or a 7 ‘for her age.’
I wonder why photographers aren’t worried about being killed by the women they photograph from this ‘perspective’.
It's just amazing to me how ONE picture can be so influential. She wears a dress with deep decolletage to a Hollywood event, where, I daresay, it was modest considering some Hollywood fashions, and folks automatically assume she dresses like that all the time?
Other pictures of her which have been posted on FR, including the one at post #27, and another at a soccer game with their daughter, will show that she knows how to dress FOR THE OCCASION. She is a professional woman, yet the NY Times, CBS, and the other major media folks can't seem to find one picture of her when she was working as a lawyer and Republican media consultant for YEARS before she ever met Fred, which would show that she can dress as a professional. They just prefer to fall back on their time honored template of bashing young, lovely Republican women.
There sure is a lot of bosom, back, and bustle showing on some of the females in that lithograph. Tsk, tsk...
We’re not supposed to talk about this here on FR.
She may be lovely, but she's a real moonbat. She was attracted to Kucinich because of his political beliefs. Nuff said.
One of the things that jumped out of the article to me was the reference to "bleached" blonde hair. Funny how Mrs. Thompson's hair is "bleached," but when it comes to Hillary her hair no doubt is "artfully highlighted," or something like that...
That' EXACTLY the impression they want to make on their readers.
No kidding.
Paparazzi nazis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.