Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
WARNING: If you want to be added to this ping list be aware that it is EXTREMELY active.
Posted on 07/09/2007 3:28:45 PM PDT by Phsstpok
Jim Geraghty posted this more than two hours ago. How on earth is it not already all over the right-wing blogosphere?
As luck would have it, I myself blockquoted that story at length and can confirm that Jim’s right. The original paragraph:
At one of the meals, she recalled, Thompson re-enacted a cowboy death scene from one of his movies. She also remembered him telling her that Sununu had just given him tickets for a VIP tour of the White House for one of Thompson’s sons and his wife.
And how it reads now, at the same URL that I linked to Friday night when the story first broke:
Thompson kept her updated on his progress in telephone conversations and over meals at Washington restaurants, including dinner at Galileo and lunch at the Monocle, she said. At one of the meals, she recalled, Thompson told her that Sununu had just given him tickets for a VIP tour of the White House for a Thompson son and his wife.
The detail about the cowboy scene is up in smoke, perhaps with good reason: as Geraghty notes, Fred doesn’t seem to have acted in any westerns before 1991. There’s no explanation for its disappearance on the LAT page and nothing on the paper’s Corrections page. And that’s not the only change. Here’s how the opening paragraph originally read:
Former Tennessee Sen. Fred D. Thompson, who is campaigning for president as a “pro-life” Republican, accepted a lobbying assignment from a family-planning group to persuade the first Bush White House to ease a controversial abortion restriction, according to a 1991 document and five people familiar with the matter.
And now:
Fred D. Thompson, who is campaigning for president as an antiabortion Republican, accepted an assignment from a family-planning group to lobby the first Bush White House to ease a controversial abortion restriction, according to a 1991 document and several people familiar with the matter.
I’m not sure what accounts for the pro-life/antiabortion change (an LAT style quirk, maybe) but here’s a possible explanation for the switch from “five people” to several. The five sources quoted in the piece in support of the claim that Fred “accepted a lobbying assignment” for the group are Judith DeSarno, Michael Barnes, and then the following three. I’m assuming nothing’s changed from the original version but at this point who can tell?
In addition to Barnes and DeSarno, three other people said they recalled Thompson lobbying against the rule on behalf of the family planning association.
Susan Cohen, a member of the association’s board of directors in 1991, said in reference to DeSarno and Thompson: “We were looking, of course, for a Republican who might have some inroads to the White House at that time, and so that’s how she came upon contacting him.”
Said Bill Hamilton, who then directed the Washington office of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, a group that was DeSarno’s main ally in lobbying on the abortion counseling rule: “I definitely recall her reaching out to [Thompson] and engaging him in some way, and trying to squeeze the White House through him.”
Sarah L. Szanton, who worked for DeSarno as director of government relations for the family planning association, agreed that Thompson “consulted on our behalf against the gag rule.”
None of the three are as explicit as DeSarno and Barnes that Fred was retained for lobbying and did in fact lobby the White House (although the first sentence of the blockquote asserts that they did). Maybe the LAT was uncomfortable asserting in the lede that all five were unambiguously claiming that Fred had “accepted a lobbying assignment” and so it was changed to a weaselly “several” to make the actual number more ambiguous.
But in that case, why reiterate per the blockquote that “three other people said they recalled Thompson lobbying against the rule”?
The changes in the first paragraph are obviously much less important than the one about the cowboy movie, which speaks to DeSarno’s credibility. I don’t know what the story is here but for a major paper to be dropping facts and rewording passages without noting it, in a bombshell story no less, is suspicious — but not surprising. As we learned during Jamilgate, the AP pulls this crap as a matter of official policy (”For corrections on live, online stories, we overwrite the previous version. We send separate corrective stories online as warranted.”) and there’s at least one notorious instance of it happening within the very bowels of the bible of the journalism industry. Exit question: What gives?
Update: We may have an answer on the pro-life/antiabortion switch. And if so, it’s exactly what you’d expect.
Methinks a whip of Rather is in the air
And I thought “Fear the Fred” was just a catchy slogan.
No doubt there is no “errors/correctons” section on the LAT blog.
Guess they are short staffed after the lay-offs.
Its the left angeles times, facts are not important.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
It’s kind of funny that these knuckleheads don’t think anyone is watching stuff like this.
My mind’s been changed. I’m viting for Osama bin Barak now.
What we have is journalistic malpractice with malice aforethought.....somebody’s got damages here if they go huntin’ for them...
There are idiots out there who believe it, tho.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
I wonder if not being a declared candidate affects one’s position in a libel suit??
You mean to tell me that the LATimes LIED ?!? Say it ain’t so, Dan.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Several, at this site, as a matter of fact—from the Hunter crowd.
John Kerry's good friend and supporter Moby
Unfortunately more than a few on FR, too.
Fredipedia: The Definitive Fred Thompson Reference
WARNING: If you want to be added to this ping list be aware that it is EXTREMELY active.
According to the stuff I've seen the people who shopped this story, including the "witnesses," are all Hillary's people, so I think this is a case of the Hillary campaign manufacturing their own ammo and then spreading it through the "vast left wing conspiracy" called the dinosaur media.
Fredophobia is an epidemic now. Not only do the liberals have it; a good number of nominal conservatives have it too. The symptoms of the disease include a tendency to fall for any dubious claim made against Fred Thompson. It does not matter that the evidence for the claims is lacking. It also manifest itself when they throw out one of those false charges without proof, and then say unless Fred proves it wrong, it must be true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.