Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elizabetty

In truth, I don’t think it’s the age difference that will bother people so much as the fact that she’s been photographed so much with her ta-tas hanging out to a degree that is unprecedented for first ladies. We just aren’t used to knowing that much about a first lady’s ta-tas.


7 posted on 07/09/2007 10:00:39 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: lady lawyer
I don’t think it’s the age difference that will bother people so much as the fact that she’s been photographed so much with her ta-tas hanging out to a degree that is unprecedented for first ladies.

What is it about Romney fans that makes (some of) them absolutely obsessed with Jeri Thompson's breasts?

11 posted on 07/09/2007 10:04:59 AM PDT by Petronski (Just say no to Rudy McRomney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer
We just aren’t used to knowing that much about a first lady’s ta-tas.

Dittos to this. Of course, the Thompsons were at Hollywood affairs, and standards of dress are quite different there. But still, an unusual situation, ta-ta wise....

14 posted on 07/09/2007 10:05:52 AM PDT by Yossarian (Everyday, somewhere on the globe, somebody is pushing the frontier of stupidity...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer
We just aren’t used to knowing that much about a first lady’s ta-tas.

Better to see Jeri Kehn Thompson's "ta-tas" than Hillary's.

36 posted on 07/09/2007 10:14:50 AM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Sic Semper Tyrannis * U.Va. Engineering '09 * Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Democrat * Fred in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer

That’ll get the vote of a lot of red-blooded conservative males.

Ta-Ta!


48 posted on 07/09/2007 10:20:44 AM PDT by Palladin (NO Shamnesty!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer
In truth, I don’t think it’s the age difference that will bother people so much as the fact that she’s been photographed so much with her ta-tas hanging out to a degree that is unprecedented for first ladies. We just aren’t used to knowing that much about a first lady’s ta-tas.

TTIWWP.

59 posted on 07/09/2007 10:25:07 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee (const Tag &referenceToConstTag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer

“We just aren’t used to knowing that much about a first lady’s ta-tas.”

I agree with you. An attractive woman doesn’t need to show that much cleavage - especially a married one. Her ta-tas are ment only for her husband’s eyes - or a nursing infant! :-)


109 posted on 07/09/2007 11:20:26 AM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer
In truth, I don’t think it’s the age difference that will bother people so much as the fact that she’s been photographed so much with her ta-tas hanging out to a degree that is unprecedented for first ladies.

There has been exactly ONE picture of the sort which you describe, and Jeri wore it to a Hollywood event at which, I'm sure, there were even more revealing frocks. In other words, her dress was appropriate for the event. I daresay when she is First Lady, there will be no cause for distress about her attire.

Oh, and I saw a newsreel last week showing Ike and Mamie arriving at some dressy event, and whatta ya know, Mamie is wearing an off the shoulder, low cut, black lace dress. So much for it not being 'First Lady' attire. And remember, Jeri is twenty years younger than either Laura Bush or Hillary Clinton, so she can wear 'younger' attire without it looking ridiculous on her.

What's funny to me is that the MSM fell all over itself when Jackie was in the White House talking about the 'stylish young First Lady'. I wonder if they'll be as appreciative toward Jeri. I, for one, won't be holding my breath.

129 posted on 07/09/2007 11:32:36 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer

Tad bit jealous, there?


135 posted on 07/09/2007 11:36:41 AM PDT by prairiebreeze (PUT AMERICA AHEAD --- VOTE FOR FRED!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer

Mmmm...Ta-Tas...


174 posted on 07/09/2007 12:08:15 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: lady lawyer
she’s been photographed so much

I have seen the same picture of her in a very unflattering dress published many times. I have seen a different picture of her in a very proper suit only once. She dresses differently for different occasions, but the MSM (and FR) seem to prefer the nightgown style dress.

If we don't start living up to Reagan's eleventh commandment, we will stay in the minority. I really don't understand all the bashing of non-favored Republican candidates by conservatives. It is really cut-off-your-nose-to-spite-your-face stupid.

359 posted on 07/09/2007 5:38:41 PM PDT by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson