Posted on 07/07/2007 6:47:26 PM PDT by f150sound
Well..Romney is criticised by many Fred fans for just changing his mind on the issue.
If the article is true, then how coming Fred is given a free pass even though he could have actually lobbyed for a abortion right’s group.
Not if you're liberal.
STOP ALREADY!!!!!
YOUR WELCOME!!!!
Previous posts by the RG fan club...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1862195/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1862152/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1862152/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1862148/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1861995/posts
If the man he hired is good at his job, why should Fred fire him? Just to satisfy those who don't like the guy's lifestyle choices? I want Fred to have the best people on the job helping him win the Presidency. As long as the man isn't making policy, it doesn't matter.
Good research.
Hillary behind story of Fred Thompson lobbying for abortion:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/1862148/posts
See, this is why the left anf MSM throw out these DAN RATHER FAKE BUT ACCURATE stories, because they know they work with a small percentage of mindless dupes.
The “freeper” is a lying troll.
“See, this is why the left and MSM throw out these DAN RATHER FAKE BUT ACCURATE stories, because they know they work with a small percentage of mindless dupes.”
Ditto for Romney supporters. Thank you.
Fred Thompson Gets ZEROs across the board from Pro-Abortion Groups
http://www.vote-smart.org ^
Posted on 07/07/2007 10:55:46 PM EDT by new yorker 77
Abortion Issues (Back to top)
2001 Thompson supported the interests of the Planned Parenthood 0 percent in 2001.
2001 Thompson supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 0 percent in 2001.
2000 Thompson supported the interests of the NARAL Pro-Choice America 0 percent in 2000.
1999-2000 Thompson supported the interests of the National Right to Life Committee 77 percent in 1999-2000.
1999 Thompson supported the interests of the Planned Parenthood 0 percent in 1999.
(Excerpt) Read more at vote-smart.org ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1862437/posts
"The AP did a wonderful job making this story seem more cut and dried than it really is, of course, but the fact is, this claim of Thompson's supposed lobbying for the National Family Planning and Reproductive Health Association is nothing but an unproven (and maybe unprovable) claim against Thompson made by people who are well-known, far left activists and heavy contributors to the Hillary Clinton for President campaign."
With all due respect, conservatives who believe this stuff with the current level of evidence (and the current accusers) are almost certainly biased in some way. I wouldn't believe these Hillary-supporting bags of crap if they told me Rudy Giuliani lobbied for a pro-abort group. Why the heck do you believe them?
It's also worth noting that Hillary's folks are scared of Fred. Hmmmmm...
I don’t really care if it is true or not.
I will take his very strong pro-life voting record over these many, many years as opposed to the very pro abort record of his opponents any day.
Not sure why this is an issue for anyone. You will be choosing between two or more people. Pick the best. He is the best on abortion between all the front-runners for certain.
Anyone who gets all hyper about this must make the Demo machine and their friends at the LA times roll in laughter at how easy they are manipulated. Sad.
This is the Rudy Guliani folks scrambling, perhaps in cahoots even with the pro-Hillary abortion on demand folks and the LATimes.
This site will be inundated as Rudy falls more. They are in full panic mode about Fred. They are getting mean, viscious, and stopping at nothing. Some were already mean before they got kicked out of here. Fred continues to climb in the polls, Guliani is falling and it is making some mad as heck.
Not only is the left afraid of Fred, but now the left field Republicans are too.
Most likely an exiled one from this year, who is in full panic mode about Rudy losing to a guy that hasn’t even announced yet... Many said, including myself, that it was too early to crown Rudy Guliani king of all peoples and that he was the only one that could win. They got mean, tore down RR and other good conservatives... There is a battle to push the party way left and the claims have been that the conservative right didn’t have a strangle hold on the party anymore. I think Fred’s rise proves them wrong. The electorate is finding about Rudy’s positions... Many want an alternative.
Rumors started by the Hillary regime. Not surprised.
I agree with you completely. This is much ado about nothing. It's the job of a lawyer to provide representation to people. Doesnt matter whether they agree with them or not. Whether they think they are innocent or guilty, creepy or nice, right or wrong ....
His campaign person may not be handling this in the best way but that's another story.
The idea that Rudy’s folks act in cahoots with Hillary’s is absurd. This thing has the prints of her PI types all over it.
They dont need help from anyone else to land something in the NYT and LAT on the same day.
That said, I still think it is much ado about nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.