Ann made a fool of herself when she took on evolution.
Most of what she included was warmed over tripe of the sort you find on creationist websites.
A summary of the rebuttals can be found here: Index of Creationist Claims.
And you make a fool of yourself when you take on Ann Coulter out here on FR.com.
Seriously though, Your comment is crap.
The evolutionist elitists are so desperate to defend "TOE" that even Stephen J. Gould had to contrive that ridiculous "punctuated equilbrium" nonsense. But his view is largely ignored now by Evolutionists since he is deceased. That is part of what Ann wrote about.
Go on. Get in bed with Gould on his view of evolution including "Punctuated Equilibrium" or ignore his comments on the current TOE that is changing even as we post just as it was when he was still "evolving" his explanations and concepts even just before he died. Was Gould correct in any aspect of his criticism of Darwinism?
So I reiterate, even he (SJG) had the sense to acknowledge that TOE was full of holes, and THAT IS WHAT ANN COULTER WROTE ABOUT last year in her book, and much more.
Right, so then Ann Coulter is a fool for what she wrote last year in her book Godless.
You are being a bit dishonest here , and I think that you might appreciate that at least I think so.
Ann Coulter slammed evolution about as well as Sutcliff did in Why Evolution is a Fraud. I realize that the walking fish crowd is so desperate to appear smarter than everyone else that they reject God and accept lame pseudosciences like evolution and global warming. Even though neither amounts to a real science like physics or chemistry. Evolution is hardly mentioned anymore in biology classes because so many folks have figured out what a complete sham it is.
For more references see http://www.evofraud.com/sources.html
But....she has a very good point. Where are all the fossils supporting evolution?