To: Sturm Ruger
Did you know during Roman times, actors were considered to be in the same social class as whores and were not eligible for burial among "decent" folk much less considered suitable for public office.
Do we really need another make-believe President?
3 posted on
07/06/2007 9:38:53 AM PDT by
AdamSelene235
(Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)
To: AdamSelene235
Do we really need another make-believe President?
Care to identify the other "make-believe President"?
To: AdamSelene235
Did you know that during more recent times, crackpots like Ron Paul would have been allowed to rot away in asylums?
Do we really need an insane president?
7 posted on
07/06/2007 9:42:09 AM PDT by
cammie
To: AdamSelene235
I didn’t know Ron Paul was an actor!
8 posted on
07/06/2007 9:42:16 AM PDT by
Theresawithanh
(With an F, and an R, and an E, and a D, and an F-R-E-D...FRED!!!!!!!!)
To: AdamSelene235
Did you know during Roman times, actors were considered to be in the same social class as whores and were not eligible for burial among "decent" folk much less considered suitable for public office.Do we really need another make-believe President?
I hope you're not referring to Reagan ...
9 posted on
07/06/2007 9:42:54 AM PDT by
SittinYonder
(Ic þæt gehate, þæt ic heonon nelle fleon fotes trym, ac wille furðor gan)
To: AdamSelene235
Do we really need another make-believe President?Were there others? Name names.
12 posted on
07/06/2007 9:43:16 AM PDT by
Petronski
(Russians don't take a dump, son, without a plan.)
To: AdamSelene235
Did you know during Roman times, actors were considered to be in the same social class as whores and were not eligible for burial among "decent" folk much less considered suitable for public office.Man, it's a good thing we're not in Roman times. We do a lot of things different here, in America, in modern times.
Do we really need another make-believe President?
No, we don't. That's why I'm proud we'll soon have a REAL candidate to consider. (FDT)
Have a nice day.
16 posted on
07/06/2007 9:46:21 AM PDT by
TnGOP
(Petey the dog is my foriegn policy advisor. He's really quite good!)
To: AdamSelene235
Oh, I soooo agree! I HATED Reagan too!
/sarc
17 posted on
07/06/2007 9:46:45 AM PDT by
The Blitherer
(What would a Free Man do?)
To: AdamSelene235
Yes, and of course, everything that was true in Roman times is still true today. Mankind has not advanced or learned anything in the last few thousand years. This is evidenced by the fact Ron Paul apparently didn't even learn from recent history, apparently thinking the Neville Chamberlain appeasement/Woodrow Wilson isolationist approach were effective diplomatic methods that just need his particular genius in order to work.
Ron Paul is a certifiable loon who has less chance to win the nomination than you or I, let alone the general election. His supporters are becoming more and more desperate as his poll numbers continue to hover around negative 3%, and so they adopt the sneaky underhanded tactics of guaranteed losers. It's pathetic and laughable, which is fitting, because so is Paul.
21 posted on
07/06/2007 9:50:42 AM PDT by
Jokelahoma
(Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
To: AdamSelene235
Do we really need another make-believe President? And just whom do you claim was the first 'make-believe president?
22 posted on
07/06/2007 9:51:11 AM PDT by
pgkdan
(Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions - G.K. Chesterton)
To: AdamSelene235
AdamSelene235 wrote: “Did you know during Roman times, actors were considered to be in the same social class as whores and were not eligible for burial among “decent” folk much less considered suitable for public office. Do we really need another make-believe President?”
Did you know that during Roman times, people ate and drank until full, then threw up and started eating and drinking all over again? Do we reeally nead to believe the words of idiots?
27 posted on
07/06/2007 9:56:20 AM PDT by
Josh Painter
(Fred STRONGLY supports the "absolute right to gun ownership" - VoteMatch)
To: AdamSelene235
Did you know during Roman times, actors were considered to be in the same social class as whores and were not eligible for burial among "decent" folk much less considered suitable for public office. Do we really need another make-believe President?
**************
Uh. Are you referring to Bill and Hillary?
52 posted on
07/06/2007 12:55:49 PM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: AdamSelene235
Do we really need another make-believe President?"Waht are you an ---hole?
81 posted on
07/06/2007 1:57:44 PM PDT by
#1CTYankee
(That's right, I have no proof. So what of it??)
To: AdamSelene235
Do we really need another make-believe President? Ironic that your nom de plume, Adam Selene, was a make-believe leader created as a nom de guerre by a self-aware computer, Mycroft Holmes, to lead an insurrection against a colonial government.
Chekhov and Heinlein would both be proud! Your objection notwithstanding, I have to LOL!
90 posted on
07/06/2007 2:07:44 PM PDT by
higgmeister
(In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
To: AdamSelene235
Do you feel same way about the credibility of Alec Baldwin, George Clooney, Streisand ????
To: AdamSelene235
Did you know during Roman times, actors were considered to be in the same social class as whores and were not eligible for burial among "decent" folk much less considered suitable for public office. Did you know during Roman times, politicians were murderous tyrants? If we're going by Roman standards, would you prefer Caligula, perhaps? Or Nero? Maybe Tiberius?
117 posted on
07/06/2007 3:57:59 PM PDT by
ellery
(I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson