Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proposed OSHA Regulation Threatens Firearm and Ammunition Industry
Website ^ | 7/1/2007 | National Shooting Sports Foundation

Posted on 07/02/2007 11:11:44 PM PDT by Revtwo

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), is proposing a regulatory rule affecting the manufacturing, transportation and storage of small arms ammunition, primers and smokeless propellants.

As written, the proposed rule would force the closure of nearly all ammunition manufacturers and force the cost of small arms ammunition to skyrocket beyond what the market could bear—essentially collapsing our industry.

This is not an exaggeration. The cost to comply with the proposed rule for the ammunition industry, including manufacturer, wholesale distributors and retailers, will be massive and easily exceed $100 million. For example, ammunition and smokeless propellant manufacturers would have to shut down and evacuate a factory when a thunderstorm approached and customers would not be allowed within 50 feet of any ammunition (displayed or otherwise stored) without first being searched for matches or lighters.

(Excerpt) Read more at nssf.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; clintonlegacy; fascism; gramsci; osha; thirdsector
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: looscnnn

Same could apply to the military if they go along with OSHA standards.


21 posted on 07/03/2007 5:19:29 AM PDT by looscnnn ("Those 1s and 0s you stepped in is a memory dump. Please clean your shoes." PC Confusious)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Frobenius

Because the differences between pubbies and rats has been a mere matter of perception, and the line of demarcation is becoming less and less noticeable.


22 posted on 07/03/2007 5:28:34 AM PDT by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Frobenius
Can someone please explain to me why this sort of thing is going on under a Republican administration?????????

Because the beltway bureaucracies and the career bureaucrats that inhabit them don't change when the administration changes. They are a natural constituency of the Democratic Party, and IMHO, one of their most powerful assets. Armed with the New Deal "substantial effects" commerce clause they can extend the reach of the federal government to encompass every aspect of our lives and circumvent even the most explicitly protected rights.

23 posted on 07/03/2007 5:40:15 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Just another attempt at gun control through ammunition control. Remember the environmental aspect of the rounds being made of lead and the push to make them out of tungsten...which would come from China!
As my title said...Can't take your guns, we'll control the Ammo
24 posted on 07/03/2007 5:50:33 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Frobenius
Can someone please explain to me why this sort of thing is going on under a Republican administration?????????

Republican or Democrat ... the objective is to disarm the People. It is part of the NWO globalization. Eventually you will understand that the US faces extinction quite by purpose.

25 posted on 07/03/2007 5:55:47 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GingisK
It is part of the NWO globalization. Eventually you will understand that the US faces extinction quite by purpose.

Actually, it appears the U.N. is directly involving itself in gun control enforcement: Gun control for Ja - UN will implement programme as safety measure ("Ja" is "Jamaica").

26 posted on 07/03/2007 6:00:58 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander
Actually, it appears the U.N. is directly...

Yes, the US is allowing those rules to trump the Constitution. The UN one of many vehicles for implementing the NWO. You will have global governance eventually ... and corporations will be the "boss".

27 posted on 07/03/2007 6:03:38 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo
I submitted my input to OSHA.

"PLEASE tell me this is a joke and that the government is not this stupid. Perhaps OSHA is concerned about the rash of gun store explosions that have been occuring during rain storms, or the epidemic of ammo fires caused by someone having a packet of matches in their pocket.

"I am used to the Federal Aviation Administration creating a stream of counterproductive, brainless regulations written by lawyers that have never actually been aboard an aircraft that harm aviation without doing anything to improve flying.

"I admit that OSHA warnings have provided a lot of laughs over the years, like the 28-page OSHA order on how to safely build and use a step ladder. A real knee-slapper is the rule that every firearm sold in the U.S. must carry a warning that says, "DUH! FIREARMS MAY CAUSE INJURY OR DEATH! READ ALL SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE USING!" Only the government could be this stupid. Then there is, "WARNING! REMOVE CLOTHES BEFORE IRONING!" and printed on a foot-long toy boat, "WARNING! NOT TO BE USED AS A FLOTATION DEVICE!" and on a Halloween Superman costume: "WARNING! COSTUME DOES NOT LET WEARER FLY!" Is everyone at OSHA really that stupid?

"At a time when the government is seen more and more as the problem and not the solution, proposals such as this just serve to make the people more contemptuous of OSHA in particular and government in general."

28 posted on 07/03/2007 6:04:51 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo
HELLO! STUPID! Smokeless powder is a propellant, not an explosive. Do they also propose that hobby shops with model rocket motors for sale should also fall under similar regulations?
29 posted on 07/03/2007 6:55:28 AM PDT by wysiwyg (What parts of “right of the people” and “shall not be infringed” do you not understand?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wysiwyg
"Do they also propose that hobby shops with model rocket motors for sale should also fall under similar regulations?"

They already do. The BATF long ago started regulating hobby rocket engines above a certain size. I haven't studied the issue in a while, so they may, in the interim, have extended the regs to ALL model rocket engines as "explosive devices".

30 posted on 07/03/2007 7:02:19 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel-NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo

I’ve always said if they couldn’t take our guns away, they would find a way to take our ammunition away.

After all, we have the right to keep and bear arms but with legal parsing of the amendment there is no mention of the right to keep and bear AMMUNITION.

It was only a matter of time........


31 posted on 07/03/2007 7:03:39 AM PDT by DH (The government writes no bill that does not line the pockets of special interests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frobenius

“Can someone please explain to me why this sort of thing is going on under a Republican administration?????????”

Oh! That Republican administration.........I’m sorry but that administration ended when Regan left office. You are now dealing with the Bush dynasty.


32 posted on 07/03/2007 7:07:54 AM PDT by DH (The government writes no bill that does not line the pockets of special interests.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo

With so many gun stores and ammunition plants exploding, something has to be done. /sarc

Congress needs to ban OSHA from regulating the firearms industry like they did when CPSC attempted same.

BWT, California politicians are also attacking gun rights by going after ammunition. There is a bill moving through the legislature that would severely impact the sale of ammunition in California and another to ban the use of lead ammunition in certain hunting situations.

Coincidence or the latest gun banner fad?


33 posted on 07/03/2007 7:12:45 AM PDT by jrp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Just wait until Hillary/Obama is in charge of OSHA. With Eliot Spitzer as AG.


34 posted on 07/03/2007 7:28:32 AM PDT by Travis McGee (--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: c-b 1

You really need to look up the definition of fascist before tossing it out as you are.


35 posted on 07/03/2007 7:49:55 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (If you agee with Democrats you agree with America's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Paging Henry Bowman. Is he on the list? :>)


36 posted on 07/03/2007 7:55:46 AM PDT by beltfed308 (Rudy: When you absolutely,positively need a liberal for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All
We need to actually READ the act and not just rely on what this website says.

On July 29, 2002, OSHA received a petition (the Petition) from the Institute of Makers of Explosives (IME) and the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute (SAAMI) to revise the standard.

So if SAAMI is behind this, how can anyone say that this is an attempt to put ammunition manufacturers out of business?

So far, what I read is that this is mostly administrative work to keep definitions consistent with other federal agencies, update regs to take into account new improved technologies, and to actually remove some regulation from the books.

But I'm still reading.

37 posted on 07/03/2007 8:13:24 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (If you agee with Democrats you agree with America's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

From what I’ve read of this so far, this actually seems to be a good thing OSHA is doing.

Anyone who deals with federal regulations has extreme frustration over how EPA, OSHA, DOT, etc all define and regulate hazardous materials.

Now it seems that OSHA is trying to gain consistency with other standards and regulations that already exist.

IOW, some standard, either national consensus (NFPA, etc) or govermental body already impacts nearly all aspects of manufacture, storage, and transport of explosives and major components, but they all do it in different words.

So far I’ve seen very little that OSHA is actually pushing that is new and infact SAAMI is behind this push, not exactly an enemy to gunowners.


38 posted on 07/03/2007 8:25:36 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (If you agee with Democrats you agree with America's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Revtwo

NSSF should be ashamed of themselves for the BS alarmist propoganda.

This type of hype gives real 2A activists a black eye.


39 posted on 07/03/2007 8:52:48 AM PDT by Eagle Eye (If you agee with Democrats you agree with America's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frobenius

Because we don’t have a Republican administration, we have a RINO administration.


40 posted on 07/03/2007 9:12:43 AM PDT by B4Ranch (Check out this website for the National Veterans Coalition http://www.nvets.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson