Perspectives: Planned Parenthood opposes choice (Abstinence)

OneNewsNow ^ | 7/2/07 | Jane Jimenez

[wagglebee]

In the greatest ANTI-CHOICE campaign of the year, Planned Parenthood has mustered its full force to deny parents and their children the choice to have abstinence education programs. And congressional members who receive campaign donations from Planned Parenthood are all too willing to be a part of this campaign.

Planned Barrenhood long ago gave up any pretense of caring about people.

[wagglebee]

Pro-Life Ping

[wagglebee]

Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or little jeremiah to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]

[curtisgardner]

I like the name South Park gives them: UnPlanned Parenthood

[EQAndyBuzz]

“Ever since Roe v. Wade, over 30 years ago, Planned Parenthood has rallied its forces around the banner of CHOICE. The ultimate insult, by extension, has been anti-choice. “

Thereby coming back with the line, I might be anti-choice, but since I am pro-life that makes you pro-death.

[Salvation]

**Perspectives: Planned Parenthood opposes choice (Abstinence)**

Of course they would oppose it. Abstinence could shut down their business of killing babies and harming would-be mothers.

[cpforlife.org]

Abortion is the choice of Planned Parenthood; its what they do and who they are.

Using the most subtle and deceptive of propaganda and manipulating people’s basest emotions, PP sold abortion as a choice worth considering. Now much of the culture is dependent on abortion as on a drug. For those who bought the lie it’s not just a choice it’s a necessity.

Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

[MountainFlower]

:;grin::
Hey, Wagglebee, you beat me to it! Did you post any of the others??? I have about 7 from that list felt were thread worthy! FReepmail me with the titles you put up, so I don't duplicate you!!

GOOD JOB!

[MountainFlower]

ping!

[Tax-chick]

Two out of three parents believe that promoting alternatives to intercourse (such as showering together and mutual masturbation, which are presented in some comprehensive programs) encourages sexual activity.

And what about the one-third who don't think taking showers together encourages sexual activity? Are they comatose? Do they weigh 400 pounds? Who are these people?

[Pinkbell]

That one third must be liberals. It explains the lack of brain cells.

[Pinkbell]

I see you are already here, MountainFlower. I was going to ping you. :)

Planned Parenthood and liberals don’t care what parents want. They sure as heck don’t care about teen abstinence. The liberal agenda is all ages having sex with multiple partners of both genders. Planned Parenthood and liberals know contracpetion isn’t foolproof. However, Planned Parenthood’s eyes are filled with their two favorite things, death and dollar signs.

[MHGinTN]

My son is 38. I can remember when there were parents who would claim allowing their teens to drink in their presence at home and have friends over to do as well was all we had to worry about with him! Can you imagine trying to raise morally upright children now? Shower together? Amazing!

[Coleus]

.

[MountainFlower]

you make me laugh!

[MountainFlower]

nothing is as it was. sadly.

[MountainFlower]

amen, Pink.

[Tax-chick]

Happy to oblige! But seriously, don’t you wonder about “the rest of the story”?

[8mmMauser]

Pinged from Terri Dailies

8mm

[MountainFlower]

w/ the picture you brought to mind, the rest of the story ?! // seriously, there is far more behind what we see or hear about. we only scratch the surface, only see the facade PP wants us to see...unless God blesses w/ a greater discernment.

the plan is bigger. PP was promoting HPV shot! why?? before I found the proof, my gut was already telling me the underlying issue was to give women the feeling of being protected. 'safer sex' kind of attitude only regarding the disease and saying nothing about the promiscuity issue, or possible conception issue. give them a false sense of security about the diseases, ignore the real issue.

there is a similar workings on the fight for abstinence programs. why is it that they can promote 'safe sex' in the schools, but not abstinence? (keep in mind this is their view of safe sex) who do you supposed is behind that blockade??

then we have a movement to take our children out of our homes at an even earlier age...SD was pressing for the Pre-School issue. they said it WASN'T mandatory in the bill they were trying to pass, however...had one been there listening to what was said, one would have heard, "let's just give it a little kick down the aisle and see how it goes". their end goal IS for mandatory pre-school for ages 3-4!

there is an entire movement shifting and trying to undermine family values. it isn't coming from the right! God open our eyes and remove the complacency. put a fire within us, a plan to carry out, and the knowledge that you go with us!