Posted on 07/02/2007 4:17:47 PM PDT by AFA-Michigan
You have been spamming Free Republic with articles regarding this topic.
We pulled one of your threads, there were five, now there are four.
Oh now I thought all this hullabaloos was about the presidency! Hum
Mitt is high priest in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, not that you seem to understand.
It matters not MHGinTN, if you know a thousand family members who left the Church you still don’t understand the function of the Lord’s Church nor the times we live in!
And the hypocrite sycophantic media could find out how that hotel cable packaging stuff works, they never did their homework in the pass why start now, they just hope the public is stupid and have enough pigeons all fired ups to carry on the myth!
They’re being patently absurd, it’s all they have.
This is so bogus. GO MITT !!!
Obviously, I don’t understand the rule, Admin.
How many stories on immigration and any number of other issues are posted daily by Freep?
So that I don’t violate whatever the policy is in the future, what’s the limit on # of posts per Freeper on a given issue?
I thought Freep’s purpose was two-fold: inform conservatives of the day’s news, and provide a forum for discussion.
The one you pulled was an article by Associated Press, by which the story just went worldwide. (You can literally read it right now on the Pravda website, but not here on Freep.) Is it OK if some other Freeper posts it, or is there a ban on the AP story in total?
The other posts I made earlier were from blogs or in-house media among Christian conservatives.
Is it not news, something that might be of useful info to Freepers watching and analyzing the prez race, to know that something being discussed on Freep today broke into the MSM? Might there be Freepers who didn’t see the earlier posts?
I’ve ignored posts from whiners complaining about my posting DIFFERENT stories or blog entries on the issue, since I assume there’s no Freep policy requiring every Freeper to read every post and comment on it.
Please advise.
Just one freepers opinion, but one thread on this issue would have been more than sufficient to allow plenty of discussion without obsessive focus on it.
Understand your observation.
Perhaps I misunderstood the purpose of the site re: advising Freepers of news rather than just bringing up topics to discuss.
In my opinion, the fact that this story just went worldwide by Associated Press is news in and of itself. Plus, it include new quotes and other substantive info not included in previous stories.
Ironic, even funny, that Freepers can read the AP story on the Pravda website in Russia right now, but not on Free Republic here in the good ole USA. Go figure.
You've been here a long time but have been a very low profile poster.
You've posted several articles trashing Romney over this issue. One was enough but we left up four of them.
Maybe it's best that you read and post at Pravda instead of Free Republic.
“You’ve been here a long time but have been a very low profile poster.”
Didn’t know there was a quota.
“You’ve posted several articles trashing Romney over this issue. One was enough but we left up four of them.”
I’m not keeping score, since my intent in posting is not to see how many posts I can make. Based on newsworthiness, suggest you put the AP story back up and take all the others down. Then there’d only be one, since the number seems to be relevant.
“Maybe it’s best that you read and post at Pravda instead of Free Republic.”
What? No sense of humor? But you’re the moderator. You’re free to block or censor all future posts of mine at your discretion. Right?
Are you a member or friend of MassResistance?
Seeing as how I’m in Michigan, would be difficult to be a “member” of Mass(achusetts) Resistance.
But certainly a fan of their work in defense of family values, their principled stand against the homosexual agenda, and their meticulously documented expo-zay on Romney’s pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, pro-gun control record.
Not so because you guys fly under different banner!
Huh? You are freaking me out.
You do the math.
That is either a lie or the writer doesn't understand the meaning of 100 percent correlation. If it were, then everyone who ever watched pornography would have molested a child. It would be a perfect predictor, and it is not.
Liberty, what law enforcement officials say — for example, the Ottawa County Sheriff in the Holland Sentinel (here in Michigan) and most recently, a prosecutor with the U.S. Dept of Justice in a mtg of pro-family activists in D.C. — is that in every case of child sexual abuse they prosecute, the offender was in possession of either adult or child porn.
Every case = 100 percent.
Now I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt that you simply overlooked the reverse correlation, with enough generosity not to call you a liar just because you did.
There’s no math involved, Smithee.
But do you never learn your lesson? I’ve lost track of how many times in a row you’ve posted false assumptions and false accusations regarding this issue, only to have them exposed as such and then obliterated by the facts in every case.
Here’s your latest: “In my kneejerk opinion, AFA-M is acting in a professional capacity beating the drum for this story. ...but he refused to answer when asked whom he is supporting.”
Let me feed you a little more line so the hook sets as deeply as possible.
Are you now making the accusation that I’m being paid by some candidate other than Mitt? Don’t leave anything to interpretation, Smithee. Come on, be specific, and let it all hang out.
Why don’t you two get a room ... this thread isn’t about either of you and now it isn’t about Mitt either. Let this one fade away, dudes.
My apology, MHG, and others.
You’re correct.
The Mitt distractors are becoming worse than liberals. They will give up our rights and constitution, if they can somehow sink Mitt!
Thanks for posting your info!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.