[Theodore R.]

Insufficient: is GWB saying that Libby is really guilty of something but merely that the jurors were overzealous? The kind of half-hearted actions one would expect of GWB

[maine-iac7]

Insufficient: is GWB saying that Libby is really guilty of something but merely that the jurors were overzealous? The kind of half-hearted actions one would expect of GWB

It's really disheartening to read such ill-informed posts, one after the other and realize that this really is FR, even though it doesn't sound like it.

Where are the voices of reason I got used to way back when?

There are sufficient posts on this thread for you nattering nellies to learn that Libby and his lawyers DO NOT WANT a full pardon at this time as it would prevent them from filing an appeal in which Libby would have a chance to clear his name and not be branded a felon for the rest of his life and to bring out the real facts of the pseudo case - AND to bring out the lies of Mitchell, Russet etc - AND to expose Fitz for the Nifong he is. Heads may yet roll = and Libby's wont be one of them.

I can only conclude that those who yet - after all the times today's actions have been explained - bash Bush over this are either:

1: in a hurry and didn't take time to read the thread

2: will seize on any excuse, however untrue, to bash Bush

3: are DU sleepers

[maine-iac7]

FGS, get a frig*ing clue!

READ THE THREAD - it will explain why LIBBY his LAWYERS DO NOT WANT a full pardon at this time!

Sorry to other folk for shouting, but will these people stop, as another poster said, "knee-jerking" and bashing Bush -

Bush did EXACTLY what Libby and his lawyers wanted him to do at this time - read the thread and you could find out why.

I can double guarantee ya that there's a lot of nervous libRats out there contemplating a Libby appeal and what could spill out of it - there may be some people who WILL go to jail...and their names be libRats