Skip to comments.
Pensioner used live artillery shell as a doorstop for 20 years
Daily Mail ^
| 7/2/2007
| Daily Mail
Posted on 07/02/2007 1:10:20 PM PDT by pacelvi
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
1
posted on
07/02/2007 1:10:23 PM PDT
by
pacelvi
To: pacelvi
Every now and then someone intervenes to save someone else from the Darwin Award.
2
posted on
07/02/2007 1:12:08 PM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: pacelvi
terrorism by pensioners?? (ha!)
3
posted on
07/02/2007 1:13:05 PM PDT
by
llevrok
(I voted for George Bush - not Jorge Arbusto.)
To: pacelvi
"There is a time delay on these type of shells." Apparently.
4
posted on
07/02/2007 1:13:22 PM PDT
by
ClearCase_guy
(Progressives like to keep doing the things that didn't work in the past.)
To: pacelvi
“There is a time delay on these type of shells. A brass ring could be turned on top which gave them enough time to fire it to go off in the air or on the ground.”
Must have been on the Decades setting.
5
posted on
07/02/2007 1:18:08 PM PDT
by
Redcitizen
(Grond! Grond! Grond!)
To: pacelvi
A lot of guys brought stuff back from WWI that could be dangerous. My Grand Uncle had an artillery shell but it was definitly empty of explosives.
6
posted on
07/02/2007 1:22:33 PM PDT
by
Leg Olam
To: Brilliant
Heard of some dumb troop who had a fired mortar round on top of his metal locker. He decides he needs to test it to see if it was a dud. He hooked his pistol belt on to the round and yanked it off the locker and on to the floor. Kaboom!
7
posted on
07/02/2007 1:22:41 PM PDT
by
Weeedley
To: pacelvi
“How many times have I told you damn kids not to slam the ...”
BOOM!!
H
To: ClearCase_guy
9
posted on
07/02/2007 1:23:17 PM PDT
by
stephenjohnbanker
( Hunter/Thompson/Thompson/Hunter in 08! "Read my lips....No new RINO's" !!)
To: pacelvi
Ahhhh...no wonder these elderly folks get accosted by airport security!
10
posted on
07/02/2007 1:23:27 PM PDT
by
Obadiah
To: pacelvi
Wonder why they couldn't have removed the detonator, empty the explosive out and just make it inert?
Many of the deco line stands/guides in the Navy were 'enerted' and polished bras shells.
Have the bottom 2" of a 5/32 polished and collecting paperclips beside the desk here...
11
posted on
07/02/2007 1:23:48 PM PDT
by
GoldCountryRedneck
("Flying is like Life: Know where you are, where you're going, and how to get there." - 'Ol Dad)
To: pacelvi
Mortar shells are fired at a steep angle with a plunging trajectory so they either explode in the air above the enemy positions or upon impact. It appears that every reporter is forced to include something in every article that showcases their ignorance.
Mortars are fired at steep angles, so that objects located behind obstructions (non-line of sight) can be struck from relatively close range.
12
posted on
07/02/2007 1:24:12 PM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
To: pacelvi
This used to happen around here with regularity. James shells, Archer Shells, and Hotchkiss shells were dug up constantly between here and Shiloh. These shells had paper fuses but in the case of the James, an impact detonator. I saw one detonator on a James that still had the cap in place once....which made me a little uneasy. These shells are worth $500 or better on the collectors' market and there are plenty of individuals with expertise to disarm them.
I know of one individual that kept a shell on his fireplace mantle and when they returned from Church the fireplace was in shambles. The shell was missing and the only explanation was that it exploded.
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: pacelvi
I think the authorities overstated the danger from this shell:
A spokesman for the bomb squad said a firing mechanism had been activated during the First World War but the shell failed to go off. The mechanism had since fallen off but the 'live' charge could have exploded at any time.
Explosives are alway dangerous, true, but bulk explosives are chosen for their stability and the most dangerous part of a shell is the primer. I also know that some of the explosives used in shells get increasingly unstable with time.
15
posted on
07/02/2007 1:25:51 PM PDT
by
Fraxinus
(My opinion worth what you paid.)
Comment #16 Removed by Moderator
To: GoldCountryRedneck
Wonder why they couldn't have removed the detonator, empty the explosive out and just make it inert? First, its Europe and all things "warlike" must be destroyed.
Second, the explosive fill had to be assumed to be highly unstable after 90 years.
17
posted on
07/02/2007 1:27:17 PM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Islamic tolerance is practiced by killing you last.)
To: pacelvi
"... I don't think he would have brought it back if he'd known it was live." But then again...
18
posted on
07/02/2007 1:27:34 PM PDT
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: pacelvi
Far more interesting than one of those black, cast-iron dachschunds you can wipe your shoes on.
To: GoldCountryRedneck
Wonder why they couldn't have removed the detonator, empty the explosive out and just make it inert? Because in WWI some shell filler explosives were Picric Acid. If the varnish protecting the interior of the metal casing deteriorated, shock-sensitive picrates would form. Even picric acid by itself can become sensitive if dried. It was replaced by the less sensitive TNT.
20
posted on
07/02/2007 1:29:20 PM PDT
by
Gorzaloon
(Global Warming: A New Kind Of Scientology for the Rest Of Us.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-103 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson