He disagreed on a date and time with a journalist - who was never even brought to the stand to prove that his version of the date and time were correct or that Libby intentionally lied about it.
I know the media wants it to be a federal crime to disagree with a journalist, but to my knowledge, this is not the case yet.
I really do not care about how you interpret the facts, accusations or evidence.
He was CONVICTED by a US court.
He has his appeals process...other than that....it is not my concern.
Nothing but chasing rabbits...just like the Chiavo case.