Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China-made ATVs under fire from U.S., Japan producers
The Hill ^ | 29 June 2007 | Ian Swanson

Posted on 07/02/2007 6:48:31 AM PDT by BGHater

Driven by an increase in imports from China, U.S. and Japanese producers have taken the unusual position of asking Congress to approve legislation mandating safety standards for all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), which consumer groups have long targeted as dangerous.

“It’s somewhat extraordinary for our industry to be asking that standards be made mandatory,” said David Murray of Yamaha, which employs over 3,000 people in the U.S. making ATVs.

He and others point to the fact that new ATV suppliers from China and Taiwan have not signed voluntary agreements adopted by companies like Yamaha and Honda to meet certain safety standards.

“The safety issue is [that] there are an increasing number of imports coming in not subject to voluntary standards,” said Ed Cohen, vice president of government affairs for Honda.

He and others say they are not just trying to keep out lower-priced imports. Instead, they say the entire industry could be jeopardized if there is a rash of injuries and deaths connected to ATVs from newer suppliers. As a result, ATV makers have shifted their position to support mandatory standards.

According to the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), about 750 people are killed and 136,000 injured annually while riding ATVs. Many of those killed are children who ride adult-sized ATVs that are heavier and faster than those made for children. It is unclear how many of these injuries and deaths are attributable to new suppliers and how many to traditional ATV producers.

ATVs from China and Taiwan are expected to reach about 500,000 in 2007, which would give them well over a third of the U.S. market. They can cost as much as $1,000 less than an ATV from Yamaha, and can be purchased over the Internet.

Earlier this month, CPSC issued a warning that young people could be injured or killed while riding the Kazuma Meerkat 50 Youth ATV, which the CPSC faulted for several serious safety defects. The CPSC faulted the Meerkat, imported from China, for lacking front brakes, having no parking brake and starting in gear.

The ATV dispute is another example of how increased trade with China is leading that fall short of U.S. health and safety standards. It is also becoming a growing issue in Congress.

Just this week, a U.S. regulatory agency warned a U.S. tire importer it could face millions in fines if it does not recall hundreds of thousands of tires imported from China that may be defective. Health and safety concerns have also been raised regarding Chinese imports of pet food, toys and even toothpaste.

“The biggest concern for CPSC is there are some new entrants that do not fall within current standards for ATVs,” said CPSC spokesman Scott Wolfson.

In the case of the Meerkat 50, CPSC could not ask for a recall because it lacks a quorum of commissioners. However, partly because of these new imports, CPSC is considering new regulations that would make voluntary standards mandatory.

But the Japanese and U.S. producers say it would take too long for CPSC to finish its rule-making process. As a result, they favor action by Congress.

Sens. Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) and Mark Pryor (D-Ark.) are likely to introduce legislation addressing the issue before the August recess, according to Ed Krenik of Bracewell Giuliani. Krenik said such a bill would likely require all ATV producers to meet certain safety standards for brakes, and for makers to provide free safety training to users.

In a letter last week to the Wall Street Journal, Stevens said he asked Chinese officials to establish strict safety standards for ATVs during a recent meeting of U.S. and Chinese legislators. Stevens also indicated legislation would be forthcoming.

ATVs have long been in the crosshairs of consumer-safety groups. In 1988, companies selling ATVs in the U.S. agreed to discontinue three-wheeled ATVs, which were considered more likely to tip over when in use. The rules being considered by CPSC would formally ban three-wheelers.

Rachel Weintraub, assistant general counsel for the Consumer Federation of America (CFA), says the new imports are a real problem, but she faults traditional ATV producers for only favoring legislation that tackles imports.

“From our perspective, the problem is much broader,” said Weintraub, who sees the current voluntary standards as too weak. CFA has lobbied for criminal and civil penalties for ATV dealers who knowingly sell adult-size ATVs that will be used by young people. ATV makers oppose such rules, which they say would be impossible to enforce.

“We don’t want this problem with ATVs to bubble up even more,” Weintraub said of the ATVs from China. “But we also don’t want the Senate to deal with ATVs and only deal with imports.”

That would be a missed opportunity, she added.

CFA also opposes a change in rules that the CPSC is considering and that could be in the Stevens-Pryor bill. That change would shift rules so that adult and youth ATVs are classified by speed instead of engine size.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Japan
KEYWORDS: atv; china; communist; trade

1 posted on 07/02/2007 6:48:32 AM PDT by BGHater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BGHater

My dad always said that you get “what you pay for”. If you need something to go out and have fun with .. just to see if it’s something you may be interested in - then buy a Chinese product and expect it to never see 1000 miles. Just beat on it and toss it.

But on the other hand, a used and old unit would provide the same fun at a lower cost.

The distributor for Eurospeed in the US (Healey) has invited me to test and render an opinion on some chinese bikes he wishes to sell here. I would suggest that before anyone buy this bike they do one of the following:

Look for a higher quality, used product
-or-
jump off a building

Both have a better result. In a country that needs quality products, well paid and talented workers, and a product to be proud of, that product has to have a high resale value. Without that, the risk of buying it is too great.


2 posted on 07/02/2007 6:56:12 AM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celerity
Chinese made ATV’s.

That sounds like a future death penalty method. Have the convict ride around on one.

3 posted on 07/02/2007 6:59:52 AM PDT by BGHater (My Tagline will defend freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Never buy for recreation what they can use for execution.
4 posted on 07/02/2007 7:05:58 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BGHater
Chinese made ATV’s. That sounds like a future death penalty method. Have the convict ride around on one.

Finish the guy off by having him brush his teeth with Chinese ethylene-glycol toothpaste. Minty fresh and it prevents radiator boil-over too!

5 posted on 07/02/2007 7:34:05 AM PDT by 6SJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

I’ve haven’t seen the ATV’s yet, but I’ve seen some Chinese made motorcycles, and wouldn’t take one of the pieces of sh!t if somebody paid me. I’ve seen cheap toasters with a better fit and finish.


6 posted on 07/02/2007 8:21:26 AM PDT by lesser_satan (FRED THOMPSON '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson