Skip to comments.
This Day In History - Civil War
July 2, 1863
The second day of battle at Gettysburg
http://www.history.com/tdih.do?action=tdihArticleCategory&id=2231 ^
Posted on 07/02/2007 4:21:52 AM PDT by mainepatsfan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
To: Shaun_MD
That question has baffled historians for over a century.
To: EternalVigilance
This is Sam Ward, my great, great, grandfather. He was with the 15th Alabama Infantry. This was taken after he had come to Texas
62
posted on
07/02/2007 5:53:10 AM PDT
by
Shaun_MD
("Republic of Texas")
To: Shaun_MD
63
posted on
07/02/2007 5:53:50 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Implement the FairTax and be free and prosperous, or stick with the StupidTax...it's up to you...)
To: mainepatsfan
The next time I go Im planning to go one of those ghost tours. Ive been on a couple with my daughter when she was a teen. She enjoyed them. Not really spooky, but it was fun to walk around Gettysburg at night and listen to the stories.
My favorite was the walking tour of Seminary Ridge after sunset. It was fun walking the Lutheran Seminary grounds and listening to stories like I said, not very scary. Its definitely PG, if you have children or grandchildern over 8, theyd love it.
To: mainepatsfan
Hood’s boys put up one heck of a fight
To: Lurking in Kansas
To: Shaun_MD
Ive often wondered, what the hell was General Lee thinking. Yes, indeed. You don't really get the sense of how foolish it was unless you stand there and look at the expanse that the confederates had to cross against fortified union positions. It is a LONG walk.
67
posted on
07/02/2007 5:58:36 AM PDT
by
mc5cents
(Show me just what Mohammd brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman)
To: mainepatsfan
I have a theory as to why, but it’s heresy in the South to say it out loud.
68
posted on
07/02/2007 5:59:09 AM PDT
by
Shaun_MD
("Republic of Texas")
To: Shaun_MD
69
posted on
07/02/2007 6:00:21 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Implement the FairTax and be free and prosperous, or stick with the StupidTax...it's up to you...)
To: StoneWall Brigade
Talk about some tough terrain to advance through.
To: Shaun_MD
I thought it was heresy just to suggest it was a bad decision.
To: Shaun_MD
Ive often wondered, what the hell was General Lee thinking. Longstreet knew the attack would fail and warned Lee against it. Actually pretty simple; Lee's overconfidence in his men and underestimating his enemy.
To: EternalVigilance
I think Lee knew the South would eventually lose and I think he wanted to bring the war to a quick conclusion.
“We are awash in a sea of blood and I want it to end”
It’s the only thing that makes sense. I don’t think Lee planned on the high number of deaths, but he had to have known that charging the center of the federal line was doomed to fail.
73
posted on
07/02/2007 6:06:17 AM PDT
by
Shaun_MD
("Republic of Texas")
To: Lurking in Kansas
I disagree. Lee was a tactical genius. He did not over estimate his enemies and he knew exactly what he was up against.
74
posted on
07/02/2007 6:10:06 AM PDT
by
Shaun_MD
("Republic of Texas")
To: Shaun_MD
Well, I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree on that one. I can’t fathom Robert E. Lee losing on purpose.
I’ll stick with my supposition: He was prideful enough to think he couldn’t lose.
Not that he didn’t have some history to back it up.
But, as the scripture says, “Pride goes before destruction.”
75
posted on
07/02/2007 6:14:35 AM PDT
by
EternalVigilance
(Implement the FairTax and be free and prosperous, or stick with the StupidTax...it's up to you...)
To: Shaun_MD
Lee had a number of things to consider.
His provisions were slowly being lost.
His supplies of powder and shot was dwindling.
Replacements for what army he had were not going to be coming. The North had good interior lines, able to move men up from washington or anywhere else in hours.
He needed a victory on Northern soil to show the CSA could campaign anywhere, instead of just in their country.
He also had to demonstrate the willingness to attack, when everything else said defense wins in this type of warfare.
There were other things going on on the 3rd day, Stuarts ride to the Confederate left as a demonstration was frustrated by a fair haired boy named Custer and the Michigan cavalry. ('Come on, Wolverines!')
What was left of Ewells corp was attacking again on the right as a demonstration to thin the Union lines.
It wasn't all just about Pickett.
76
posted on
07/02/2007 6:14:45 AM PDT
by
Pistolshot
(We sleep safe, knowing good men and women are willing to do violence on our behalf.)
To: Pistolshot
Very true. It may have been that he knew it was long odds, but he felt like he had no choice. Also remember that the loss of Jackson hit Lee very hard.
77
posted on
07/02/2007 6:20:15 AM PDT
by
Shaun_MD
("Republic of Texas")
To: mainepatsfan
How long do they take?Maybe 2 hours?? My memory is getting bad, LOL.
You start at sunset, so obviously when you finish varies. IIRC we were back to the motel by 10:00 10:30.
To: EternalVigilance
Well you have to consider that Lee was a military genius. He was also an extremely religious and humble man, like Thomas Jackson so I’m not sure it was pride. I guess we’ll never know until we get up there and ask him lol.
79
posted on
07/02/2007 6:26:28 AM PDT
by
Shaun_MD
("Republic of Texas")
To: Shaun_MD
Lee was a tactical genius. I agree with you there.
He did not over estimate his enemies and he knew exactly what he was up against.
Not on the afternoon of July 3, 1863.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-97 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson