Nothing in the assassination adds up; sure, I can respect people making the lone gun nut theory and others that are counter.
I found this story last weekend; it sounds far out, but it is after all; a Dallas Times-Herald photographer who was there when Ruby shot Oswald. He says there was “no blood.” http://theuniversalseduction.com/articles/photographer-who-snapped-infamous-oswald-photo-said-no-blood-at-crime-scene (just went to find the story, I have no idea what this website is about). Everything about the assassination has some odd twist or turn to it. That’s why it is suspicious. I can respect those saying “one gun man” but what if, vs. the Warren Commission; they were trying a man in a court of law with 12 jurors? I can’t buy the magic bullet shot under those circumstances.
Now that is one of the more bizarre theories, and one that I’ve never heard. I’m going to have to look at some of those photos to see if I can see any blood. Thanks for the post.