Replies

“No credible witnesses place him on the sixth floor”

His prints were on the weapon and on the boxes used to create the snipers nest.

“The gun was not in his name, nor was his ownership of it established”

There was no reason for it to be. You may be too young to realize but prior to the gun control laws enacted in the late 60s, one could order a firearm (as did Oswald) from the Montgomery Wards catalog with no background checks and no paperwork. There is paperwork establishing that he did order such a gun.

“The fatal shot comes from the front and to the right, splattering the back of the car and the motorcycle policemen to the left rear with blood and brain matter.”

The autopsy established that the fatal shot entered the rear of the skull leaving a classic entry wound crater and exited the front of the skull leaving a classic exit wound.

BTW: This is a wonderful debate, and I appreciate your knowledge, though we may disagree.
His prints were on the weapon and on the boxes used to create the snipers nest.
Of course his fingerprints were on the boxes, he worked there. The only print on the weapon was a partial palmprint on the stock. If he fired the weapon, and carried it that morning, were are all the other prints?

There was no reason for it to be. You may be too young to realize but prior to the gun control laws enacted in the late 60s, one could order a firearm (as ....
I wish I was too young to remember... alas. The gun was ordered in the name of A. Hidel (sp?), and shipped to a PO Box, paid by Money order in the same name. Osawld denied that it was his rifle, as did Marina in the first interview (though she later recanted that denial).
The autopsy established that the fatal shot entered the rear of the skull leaving a classic entry wound crater and exited the front of the skull leaving a classic exit wound.The autopsy was performed by a doctor who had no prior experience with gunshot wounds. Parkland doctors' impressions of the wounds differ significatnly with the official autopsy report.