Posted on 06/30/2007 4:36:50 PM PDT by 1066AD
You tell me. It's always that way with conspiracists:
Me: It happened this way.
You: No it didn't.
Me: Yes it did. Here's the evidence.
You: Nuh uh. I don't buy it, especially not from those crooks.
Me: Why not?
You: YOU TELL ME! (*burp*).
There is the proof of the extra assassin.
Dr. Shooter 2.5, you're needed in the Zapruder room, please. Connally coat lapel lift at frame 219, I believe.
While spanalot is explaining how and from where the extra assassin was, we're content with the previously shown evidence.
Spanalot, your turn. Go on. I hope that I won't hear 'YOU TELL ME!'.
Probably the rifle not the clip.
I also don’t believe Carcanos eject their clips on the last shot. Garands do but not the Carcano. If there is any information otherwise, I would like to see it.
They are supposed to, The cartridges are the only thing hokding the clip in the magazine.
But doesn't alwatys happen. When he did his reconstruction, Dr John K Lattimer found that two of the four Carcanos he purchased would not reliably eject the clip automatically(Didn't affect the ammo feed however)
. We have. You say it's not so, then don't say why.
Bull. I've explained in detail why your single bullet theory does not work.
Me: It happened this way.
No it didn't. And I explain why.
Me: Yes it did. Here's the evidence.
I don't buy it. That's Specter's theory, not evidence.
Me: Why not?
(*burp*).
You drinking already? - I'm about to go to a party and will join you soon.
I’m not referencing Stone’s movie. I’ve got several bookcases full of material on the JFK assassination. And while fingerprints may be an archaic police method, if memory serves, the assassination took place a long time ago.
... You're not saying there's no prints or that they're not Oswald's prints.
Alright, so we have Oswald's prints on Oswald's rifle. Pretty damning evidence, wouldn't you say? Glad that's settled.
JoeA makes a good point, some conspiracy theorists apparently don’t like the take of the JFK movie; but at least it puts a lot of the issues out there. There are hundreds of books on the subject; maybe up to 700.
Reading some of the testimony, like that of Warren Reynolds or Dean Andrews is a bit astounding (http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ). And then, reading Andrews testimony in the Garrison case after his testimony in the Warren Commission surely would make many wonder.
Kennedy is hit at 224 and already bringing his arms up and Connelly is still gawking around.
Tough one to lose but this is proof of a second shooter.
Bingo!!
I’ll admit to Oswald’s single palm print on the rifle. There is no disputing that. But how is it that there is only one print? If he handled the gun, there would have to be more than one, on the barrel, the stock, somewhere else. And, if he fired the rifle, why was the Dallas PD nitrate test negative?
Again, with the paraffin testing, it's a non-issue. It even came up partially positive.
Extra bullets, where, exactly?
Thanks for the fun. I counted four out and out lies.
I figured you had to use a pry bar to pull your terrible trigger.
Just keep posting about guns. The mistakes keep adding up.
“Just keep posting about guns. The mistakes keep adding up.”
What mistakes?
That “Zapruder” image has more touchup than my motherinlaws face.
Dont forget the Zapruder film was not released until ten years later.
I have a Remington 788 in .243, and the action is not all that slick, and I am an average shot at best, but I think that with a rest such as a window frame, I could easily put 3 shots in the black at 80 yards in 8.3 seconds. That's giving me four seconds each follow up shot to work the bolt and re-aim, not that tough when motivated and full of adrenaline.
I believe it is the Warren Commission and the FBI experts who have some reservations about the palm print found on the gun.
Fibers from Oswald's shirt are found on the rifle. Likewise on the box too.
-----------------------
"The FBI tests of the Mannlicher-Carcano's accuracy showed that the rifle was:
1) Inaccurate from 15 yards.[10]
2) Carrying a scope that was mounted for a left-handed person (Oswald was right-handed).[11]
3) The rifle was unable to be "sighted-in", using the scope, without the installation of 2 metal shims (small metal plates) which were not present when the rifle arrived for testing, and were never found.[12]
During efforts supervised by the FBI to duplicate the shooting accuracy allegedly achieved, no FBI, military or civilian (National Rifle Association) expert was ever able to match Oswald's performance. No tests have ever been made using Oswald's rifle in the condition in which it was found.[16]"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
